Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al

Filing 121

STIPULATED JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, in favor of Don Henley against Justin Hart. It Is Ordered that As compensation for the burden and expense of enforcing the parties' settlement of the action, Defendant Justin Hart is liable to Plaintiff Don Henley for the sum of $35,000.00. Upon entry of this Judgment, the parties may no longer seek to reopen the case pursuant to the Court's 10/12/10 Order. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 120 (twdb)

Download PDF
Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al Doc. 121 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP JACQUELINE C. CHARLESWORTH (pro hac vice) JCharlesworth@mofo.com CRAIG B. WHITNEY (CA SBN 217673) CWhitney@mofo.com 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104 Telephone: 212.468.8000 Facsimile: 212.468.7900 PAUL GOLDSTEIN (CA SBN 79613) PGoldstein@mofo.com 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, California 94305-8610 Telephone: 650.723.0313 Facsimile: 650.327.0811 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ONE LLP CHRISTOPHER W. ARLEDGE (CA SBN 200767) CArledge@onellp.com JOHN TEHRANIAN (CA SBN 211616) JTehranian@onellp.com 4000 MacArthur Blvd. West Tower, Suite 1100 Newport Beach, California 92660 Telephone: 949.502.2870 Facsimile: 949.258.5081 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DON HENLEY, MIKE CAMPBELL and DANNY KORTCHMAR, v. Plaintiffs, Case No. SACV09-0481 JVS (RNBx) STIPULATED JUDGMENT CHARLES S. DEVORE and JUSTIN HART, Defendants. ny-953885 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, on June 10, 2010, this Court issued an Order regarding the parties' motions for summary judgment, which held, inter alia, that Defendants were liable under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., for the infringement of Plaintiffs' musical compositions; WHEREAS, by supplemental agreement, the parties subsequently agreed to a settlement in principle to resolve Plaintiffs' remaining damages and other claims resulting from such infringements, pursuant to which this Court issued an Order dismissing the action on July 12, 2010, subject to the ability to reopen the action if the settlement were not consummated; WHEREAS, a settlement agreement was finalized, but Plaintiffs did not receive timely payment of the full settlement amount due under the agreement; WHEREAS, on July 16, 2010 and October 12, 2010, this Court issued further Orders, pursuant to which Plaintiffs have until January 10, 2010 to reopen this action due to Defendants' failure to pay the full settlement amount due; and WHEREAS, by supplemental agreement, the parties resolved the issue of Defendants' failure to pay the full settlement amount by providing Defendants an extension of time to pay, and further agreeing to the entry of a Stipulated Judgment, pursuant to which Defendant Justin Hart is to pay additional compensation to Plaintiff Don Henley for the burden and expense of enforcing the parties' settlement; NOW, THEREFORE, having considered the concurrently filed stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1. As compensation for the burden and expense of enforcing the parties' settlement of the action, Defendant Justin Hart is liable to Plaintiff Don Henley for the sum of Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($35,000.00). 2. Upon entry of this judgment, the parties may no longer seek to reopen the case pursuant to the Court's October 12, 2010 Order. 1 ny-953885 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. Each of the parties to the action shall bear his own legal costs and attorneys' fees incurred in the action. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 and 79, and Local Rule 58-1, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter this judgment in the docket at the earliest practicable time. Dated: December 13, 2010 Honorable James V. Selna United States District Judge 2 ny-953885

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?