Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al

Filing 2

NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiffs Don Henley, Mike Campbell, (twdb) (lwag).

Download PDF
Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al ,py Doc. 2 1 0,-' CHARES S. BARQUIST (CA SBN 133785) ; £!;:~ f'g c" -0( ~J 2 3 fl~lRlslim&fF8ĖRSTER LLP ” :-~::~! j 4 5 Tel simi e: 213.892.5200 ,)'-'- i -Š Facepholne:213.892.5454 I ~~L;~; :; JACQUELINE C. CHARLESWORTH (pro hac vice pendJn;g);:~ ~ Los Angeles, California 90013-1024 , -i 555 West Fifth Street . i "'"£1 " o (l' 6 7 8 JEChaD.eswo(proC2mofo.com . . -” il CffEN rth hac vice pending) I K LVIN KChenC2mofo.com 1290 Avenue of MORRON & FOERSTER LLP the Americas New York, New York 10104-0185 Telephone: 212.468.8000 Facsimile: 212.468.7900 9 10 11 PAUL GOLDSTEIN (CA SBN 79613) pgoldstein~mofo.com 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, California 94305-8610 Telephone: 650.723.0313. Facsimile: 650.327.0811 . \' ' ,:.\.:..-;,: 12 13 14 15 Attofl~S for Plaintiffs DON HENLEY and MIKE CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 SAC V09-U'481 1'J$ (RivBi) DON HENLEY and MIKE CAMPBELL, Plaintiffs, Case No. v. 20 21 NOTICE OF' INTERESTED PARTIES CHARLES S. DEVORE and 23 JUSTIN HART, 22 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 la-10249 1 6 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1-1, the undersigned, counsel of record for 2 Plaintiffs Don Henley and Mike Campbell, certifies that the foI:owing listed parties 3 may have a pecuniary interest in the outcome of this case. These representations 4 are made to enable the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusaL. 5 Don Henley 6 Mike Campbell 7 8 Dated: April 17, 2009 9 10 11 MORRSON & FOERSTER LLP CHARLES S. BARQUIST JACQUELINE C. CHARLESWORTH KELVIN D. CHEN PAUL GOLDSTEIN 12 By: 13 14 15 AttoID,eys for Plaintiffs DON HENLEY and MIKE CAMPBELL 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 la-I024916

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?