Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al
Filing
2
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiffs Don Henley, Mike Campbell, (twdb) (lwag).
Don Henley et al v. Charles S Devore et al
,py
Doc. 2
1
0,-' CHARES S. BARQUIST (CA SBN 133785) ; £!;:~ f'g
c"
-0( ~J
2
3
fl~lRlslim&fF8ĖRSTER LLP ” :-~::~! j
4
5
Tel simi e: 213.892.5200 ,)'-'- i -Š Facepholne:213.892.5454 I ~~L;~; :;
JACQUELINE C. CHARLESWORTH (pro hac vice pendJn;g);:~ ~
Los Angeles, California 90013-1024 , -i
555 West Fifth Street . i
"'"£1
"
o
(l'
6 7
8
JEChaD.eswo(proC2mofo.com . . -” il CffEN rth hac vice pending) I K LVIN
KChenC2mofo.com
1290 Avenue of
MORRON & FOERSTER LLP the Americas
New York, New York 10104-0185
Telephone: 212.468.8000 Facsimile: 212.468.7900
9
10
11
PAUL GOLDSTEIN (CA SBN 79613) pgoldstein~mofo.com 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, California 94305-8610
Telephone: 650.723.0313. Facsimile: 650.327.0811
. \' ' ,:.\.:..-;,:
12
13
14
15
Attofl~S for Plaintiffs DON HENLEY and MIKE CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16 17
18
19
SAC V09-U'481 1'J$ (RivBi)
DON HENLEY and MIKE CAMPBELL,
Plaintiffs,
Case No.
v.
20
21
NOTICE OF' INTERESTED PARTIES
CHARLES S. DEVORE and 23 JUSTIN HART,
22
24 Defendants.
25
26
27
28
la-10249 1 6
Dockets.Justia.com
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1-1, the undersigned, counsel of record for
2 Plaintiffs Don Henley and Mike Campbell, certifies that the foI:owing listed parties
3 may have a pecuniary interest in the outcome of this case. These representations
4 are made to enable the Court to evaluate possible disqualification or recusaL.
5 Don Henley
6 Mike Campbell
7
8 Dated: April 17, 2009
9
10
11
MORRSON & FOERSTER LLP CHARLES S. BARQUIST JACQUELINE C. CHARLESWORTH KELVIN D. CHEN PAUL GOLDSTEIN
12
By:
13
14
15
AttoID,eys for Plaintiffs
DON HENLEY and MIKE CAMPBELL
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 28
1
la-I024916
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?