Susan Creanza v. Raytheon Electronic Systems et al
Filing
24
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, re DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Based upon the Joint Stipulation 23 Regarding Dismissal With Prejudice, the Court Orders that: (1) The above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); and (2) Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs with respect to the dismissal of the above-captioned action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rla)
1
2
3
J S -6
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
RAYTHEON ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, )
)
RAYTHEON COMPANY, HUGHES
)
NON-BARGAINING RETIREMENT
)
PLAN, RAYTHEON NON)
BARGAINING RETIREMENT PLAN
)
AND DOES 1 THROUGH 20,
)
INCLUSIVE
)
)
Defendants.
)
SUSAN CREANZA
CASE NO.: SACV09-773 CJC (RNBX)
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Complaint Filed: July 7, 2009
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Susan Creanza v. Raytheon Electronic Systems, et al.
SACV 09-773 CJC (RNBX)
1
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
4
For good cause appearing and based upon the Joint Stipulation Regarding
Dismissal With Prejudice, the Court Orders that:
5
6
(1)
pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); and
7
8
The above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice
(2)
Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs with respect to
the dismissal of the above-captioned action.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED._________________
10
11
12
Dated:
June 2, 2011
13
___________________________________
HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Susan Creanza v. Raytheon Electronic Systems, et al.
SACV 09-773 CJC (RNBX)
2
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?