Susan Creanza v. Raytheon Electronic Systems et al

Filing 24

ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, re DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Based upon the Joint Stipulation 23 Regarding Dismissal With Prejudice, the Court Orders that: (1) The above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); and (2) Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs with respect to the dismissal of the above-captioned action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rla)

Download PDF
1 2 3 J S -6 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) RAYTHEON ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, ) ) RAYTHEON COMPANY, HUGHES ) NON-BARGAINING RETIREMENT ) PLAN, RAYTHEON NON) BARGAINING RETIREMENT PLAN ) AND DOES 1 THROUGH 20, ) INCLUSIVE ) ) Defendants. ) SUSAN CREANZA CASE NO.: SACV09-773 CJC (RNBX) [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Complaint Filed: July 7, 2009 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Susan Creanza v. Raytheon Electronic Systems, et al. SACV 09-773 CJC (RNBX) 1 ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 4 For good cause appearing and based upon the Joint Stipulation Regarding Dismissal With Prejudice, the Court Orders that: 5 6 (1) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); and 7 8 The above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice (2) Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs with respect to the dismissal of the above-captioned action. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED._________________ 10 11 12 Dated: June 2, 2011 13 ___________________________________ HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Susan Creanza v. Raytheon Electronic Systems, et al. SACV 09-773 CJC (RNBX) 2 ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?