Raul Rojas Alvarado v. The Wolf Firm, A Law Corporation et al
Filing
40
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dolly M. Gee. On February 25, 2010 this court granted defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiff's complaint and granted plaintiff leave to amend his complaint by no later than March 18, 2010. Plaintiff ha ving failed to file a first amended complaint, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff show cause in writing no later than April 7, 2010 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond by April 7, 2010 shall result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (pp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No.
Title
SA CV 09-0956-DMG-ANx)
Date
MARCH 30, 2010
Raul Rojas Alvarado v. The Wolf Firm, A Law Corporation, et al., DOLLY M. GEE., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE NOT REPORTED Court Reporter
Present: The Honorable
YOLANDA SKIPPER Deputy Clerk
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: None Present
Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present
Proceedings:
IN CHAMBERS-ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES
On February 25, 2010 this court granted defendants' motions to dismiss plaintiff's complaint and granted plaintiff leave to amend his complaint by no later than March 18, 2010. Plaintiff having failed to file a first amended complaint, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff show cause in writing no later than April 7, 2010 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond by April 7, 2010 shall result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.
cc: all parties
CV-90 (12/02)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Initials of Deputy Clerk ys
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?