Susan Novak v. The Boeing Company et al

Filing 167

ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: To Dismiss, with Prejudice, Plaintiffs Susan Novak's and Victor Clement's Remaining Claims Asserted Against Defendant The Boeing Company. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mt)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 J S -6 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 SUSAN NOVAK, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated and the general public, et al. CASE NO. SACV 09-1011 CJC(ANx) Honorable Cormac J. Carney 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive. ORDER TO DISMISS, WITH PREJUDICE, PLAINTIFFS SUSAN NOVAK’S AND VICTOR CLEMENT’S REMAINING CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST DEFENDANT THE BOEING COMPANY 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Pursuant to Stipulation between the parties and FOR 27 GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, it is hereby ORDERED that the claims of 28 Plaintiffs Susan Novak and Victor Clement asserted in this 1 action, both as individually named plaintiffs and purported class 2 representatives set forth in the Third Amended Complaint, 3 previously filed on June 13, 2011, against Defendant The Boeing 4 Company, are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, in their entirety, 5 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil 6 Procedure, with each party to bear their own costs and fees 7 connected with this dismissal. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 DATED: February 29, 2012 12 13 __________________________________ The Honorable Cormac J. Carney United States District Judge 4819-2651-0089.1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?