Federal Trade Commission v. Commerce Planet, Inc. et al

Filing 220

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, TO TREAT AS CONFIDENTIAL PLAINTIFF'S TRIAL EXHIBITS 326, 1180, 1185, 1187, 1240-45, 1262, AND 1286 re Stipulation for Protective Order 219 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: In the event the below-referenced exhibits are offered into evidence, they shall be preserved as confidential. Defendant Charles Gugliuzza does not waive any objections to the introduction of the below-referenced exhibits at trial. The proposed exhibits covered by this Protective Order shall include the following: (See document for further details.) (rla)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WILLARD K. TOM General Counsel DAVID M. NEWMAN (Calif. Bar #54218) ERIC D. EDMONDSON (D.C. Bar #450294) EVAN ROSE (Calif. Bar #253478) KERRY O’BRIEN (Calif. Bar #149264) Federal Trade Commission 901 Market Street, Suite 570 San Francisco, CA 94103 P: 415-848-5100; F: 415-848-5184 dnewman@ftc.gov; eedmondson@ftc.gov erose@ftc.gov; kobrien@ftc.gov RAYMOND E. MCKOWN (Calif. Bar #150975) Federal Trade Commission 9 10877 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90024 10 P: 310-824-4343; F: 310-824-4380 rmckown@ftc.gov 8 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION 14 15 16 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 20 21 22 23 24 COMMERCE PLANET, INC., a corporation, and MICHAEL HILL, CHARLES GUGLIUZZA, and AARON GRAVITZ, individually and as officers of COMMERCE PLANET, INC., Defendants. 25 26 27 28 PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. SACV-09-01324 CJC (RNBx) [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER TO TREAT AS CONFIDENTIAL PLAINTIFF’S TRIAL EXHIBITS 326, 1180, 1185, 1187, 1240-45, 1262, AND 1286 1 Trial commenced in this matter on Tuesday, January 31, 2012. In the 2 presentation of its case, Plaintiff has offered or intends to offer into evidence 3 certain exhibits that contain personal data identifiers, as defined in Local Rule 79- 4 5.4, such as home addresses. All of these proposed exhibits (with the exception of 5 Exhibits 326 and 1262) are electronically stored information (“ESI”) kept in their 6 native format, and all are quite voluminous. Plaintiff has offered or intends to 7 offer them as foundational evidence to support its claims. As such, these proposed 8 exhibits cannot be redacted pursuant to L.R. 79-5.4 because: (1) any such 9 redaction would materially change the ESI within them and thereby threaten their 10 evidentiary value; and/or (2) redaction is impractical because the exhibits are so 11 voluminous. 12 In order to protect the personal data identifiers in these proposed exhibits, 13 and for good cause shown, 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 15 In the event the below-referenced exhibits are offered into evidence, they 16 shall be preserved as confidential. Defendant Charles Gugliuzza does not waive 17 any objections to the introduction of the below-referenced exhibits at trial. The 18 proposed exhibits covered by this Protective Order shall include the following: 19 20 Exhibit Plaintiff’s Exhibit 326 Description Excel spreadsheet of consumer complaints 21 received by Commerce Planet (spreadsheet 22 Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1180 created by Bruce Gale) Gale Dec Attachment 4 (Email archives) 25 Plaintiff’s Exhibits 1185, FTC_CP_005794.xls [native file] Customer service call recordings 26 1187, and 1240-41 Plaintiff’s Exhibits 1242-45 Email complaint files in .pst format 23 24 27 28 PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 2 1 2 Exhibit Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1262 Description Scanned hard copy consumer complaints in Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1286 .pdf format Customer database in .mdb format 3 4 5 6 At all trial proceedings in this matter, the above proposed exhibits will be 7 covered by this Protective Order and shall be used only for prosecution and/or 8 defense of this or other litigation involving the Plaintiff and Trial Defendant and 9 under no circumstances, other than those specifically provided for in this or 10 subsequent court orders, shall such material be disclosed to persons other than 11 Qualified Persons. 12 13 “Qualified person(s)” shall mean and refer to: (a) Outside or inside counsel that have appeared for Plaintiff or 14 Trial Defendant in the captioned case and regular and 15 temporary employees of such counsel assisting in the conduct 16 of such case, including employees of any firm retained to 17 reproduce the above proposed exhibits for use in accordance 18 with this Protective Order; 19 (b) Experts or consultants assisting counsel in this litigation; 20 (c) Employees of Trial Defendant who are required to assist counsel in the conduct of this action; 21 22 (d) Employees of the Federal Trade Commission or other United 23 States law enforcement agency involved in investigating or 24 litigating against the defendants; 25 (e) Directors, officers, and employees of Defendants who are 26 designated as trial witnesses and other persons who counsel for 27 Plaintiff in good faith believes may be fact or expert witnesses 28 at trial to the extent deemed necessary by counsel for the PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 3 witnesses’ preparation for testimony; 1 (f) 2 Witnesses, and their counsel, during the course of testimony 3 presented in this action, and court reporters and persons 4 preparing transcripts of that testimony; 5 (g) The Court and Court personnel; 6 (h) Any person, pursuant to a stipulation by Plaintiff and Trial Defendant; and 7 (i) 8 Other persons only upon order of the Court. Each person given access to the above proposed exhibits shall be advised 9 10 that the material or information is being disclosed pursuant and subject to the 11 terms of this Protective Order and may not be disclosed other than pursuant to its 12 terms. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED: 15 16 Dated: February 14, 2012 _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 Presented by: 21 /s/ Evan Rose DAVID M. NEWMAN 23 ERIC D. EDMONDSON EVAN ROSE 24 KERRY O’BRIEN RAYMOND E. MCKOWN 22 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 27 28 PROTECTIVE ORDER Page 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?