Federal Trade Commission v. Commerce Planet, Inc. et al
Filing
220
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney, TO TREAT AS CONFIDENTIAL PLAINTIFF'S TRIAL EXHIBITS 326, 1180, 1185, 1187, 1240-45, 1262, AND 1286 re Stipulation for Protective Order 219 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: In the event the below-referenced exhibits are offered into evidence, they shall be preserved as confidential. Defendant Charles Gugliuzza does not waive any objections to the introduction of the below-referenced exhibits at trial. The proposed exhibits covered by this Protective Order shall include the following: (See document for further details.) (rla)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
WILLARD K. TOM
General Counsel
DAVID M. NEWMAN (Calif. Bar #54218)
ERIC D. EDMONDSON (D.C. Bar #450294)
EVAN ROSE (Calif. Bar #253478)
KERRY O’BRIEN (Calif. Bar #149264)
Federal Trade Commission
901 Market Street, Suite 570
San Francisco, CA 94103
P: 415-848-5100; F: 415-848-5184
dnewman@ftc.gov; eedmondson@ftc.gov
erose@ftc.gov; kobrien@ftc.gov
RAYMOND E. MCKOWN (Calif. Bar #150975)
Federal Trade Commission
9 10877 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90024
10 P: 310-824-4343; F: 310-824-4380
rmckown@ftc.gov
8
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Federal Trade Commission
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
14
15
16
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
17
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
20
21
22
23
24
COMMERCE PLANET, INC., a
corporation,
and
MICHAEL HILL, CHARLES
GUGLIUZZA, and
AARON GRAVITZ, individually and as
officers of COMMERCE PLANET, INC.,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. SACV-09-01324 CJC
(RNBx)
[PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER TO
TREAT AS CONFIDENTIAL
PLAINTIFF’S TRIAL
EXHIBITS 326, 1180, 1185,
1187, 1240-45, 1262, AND 1286
1
Trial commenced in this matter on Tuesday, January 31, 2012. In the
2
presentation of its case, Plaintiff has offered or intends to offer into evidence
3
certain exhibits that contain personal data identifiers, as defined in Local Rule 79-
4
5.4, such as home addresses. All of these proposed exhibits (with the exception of
5
Exhibits 326 and 1262) are electronically stored information (“ESI”) kept in their
6
native format, and all are quite voluminous. Plaintiff has offered or intends to
7
offer them as foundational evidence to support its claims. As such, these proposed
8
exhibits cannot be redacted pursuant to L.R. 79-5.4 because: (1) any such
9
redaction would materially change the ESI within them and thereby threaten their
10
evidentiary value; and/or (2) redaction is impractical because the exhibits are so
11
voluminous.
12
In order to protect the personal data identifiers in these proposed exhibits,
13
and for good cause shown,
14
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
15
In the event the below-referenced exhibits are offered into evidence, they
16
shall be preserved as confidential. Defendant Charles Gugliuzza does not waive
17
any objections to the introduction of the below-referenced exhibits at trial. The
18
proposed exhibits covered by this Protective Order shall include the following:
19
20
Exhibit
Plaintiff’s Exhibit 326
Description
Excel spreadsheet of consumer complaints
21
received by Commerce Planet (spreadsheet
22
Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1180
created by Bruce Gale)
Gale Dec Attachment 4 (Email archives)
25
Plaintiff’s Exhibits 1185,
FTC_CP_005794.xls [native file]
Customer service call recordings
26
1187, and 1240-41
Plaintiff’s Exhibits 1242-45
Email complaint files in .pst format
23
24
27
28
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Page 2
1
2
Exhibit
Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1262
Description
Scanned hard copy consumer complaints in
Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1286
.pdf format
Customer database in .mdb format
3
4
5
6
At all trial proceedings in this matter, the above proposed exhibits will be
7
covered by this Protective Order and shall be used only for prosecution and/or
8
defense of this or other litigation involving the Plaintiff and Trial Defendant and
9
under no circumstances, other than those specifically provided for in this or
10
subsequent court orders, shall such material be disclosed to persons other than
11
Qualified Persons.
12
13
“Qualified person(s)” shall mean and refer to:
(a)
Outside or inside counsel that have appeared for Plaintiff or
14
Trial Defendant in the captioned case and regular and
15
temporary employees of such counsel assisting in the conduct
16
of such case, including employees of any firm retained to
17
reproduce the above proposed exhibits for use in accordance
18
with this Protective Order;
19
(b)
Experts or consultants assisting counsel in this litigation;
20
(c)
Employees of Trial Defendant who are required to assist
counsel in the conduct of this action;
21
22
(d)
Employees of the Federal Trade Commission or other United
23
States law enforcement agency involved in investigating or
24
litigating against the defendants;
25
(e)
Directors, officers, and employees of Defendants who are
26
designated as trial witnesses and other persons who counsel for
27
Plaintiff in good faith believes may be fact or expert witnesses
28
at trial to the extent deemed necessary by counsel for the
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Page 3
witnesses’ preparation for testimony;
1
(f)
2
Witnesses, and their counsel, during the course of testimony
3
presented in this action, and court reporters and persons
4
preparing transcripts of that testimony;
5
(g)
The Court and Court personnel;
6
(h)
Any person, pursuant to a stipulation by Plaintiff and Trial
Defendant; and
7
(i)
8
Other persons only upon order of the Court.
Each person given access to the above proposed exhibits shall be advised
9
10
that the material or information is being disclosed pursuant and subject to the
11
terms of this Protective Order and may not be disclosed other than pursuant to its
12
terms.
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED:
15
16
Dated: February 14, 2012
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
Presented by:
21
/s/ Evan Rose
DAVID M. NEWMAN
23 ERIC D. EDMONDSON
EVAN ROSE
24 KERRY O’BRIEN
RAYMOND E. MCKOWN
22
25
26
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
27
28
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Page 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?