Kenneth Ford v. United States of America

Filing 34

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John A Kronstadt: RE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AND DISMISSING CASE. The Court granted defendants motion on July 11, 2011, and stayed the order to allow plaintiff to file a declaration no late r than July 18, 2011, explaining his non-appearance at his scheduled deposition, non-appearance at the July 11 motion hearing, and failure to comply with this Courts standing orders concerning the final pretrial conference. Plaintiff has not filed a declaration or any other pleading to explain or seek to excuse his non-compliance with the Courts orders or his failure to oppose the case dispositive motion filed by defendant. Accordingly, as the Court previously stated it would do under these circumstances if plaintiff failed timely to respond by the extended date set by the Court, the Court makes final its July 11, 2011 Order. This matter is dismissed with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.

SA CV10-00796 JAK (RNBx)

Title

Kenneth Ford v. United States of America

Present: The Honorable

Date

July 20, 2011

JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Andrea Keifer

Not Reported

Deputy Clerk

Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

Not Present

Not Present

Proceedings:

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION AND DISMISSING CASE JS-6

The Court granted defendant’s motion on July 11, 2011, and stayed the order to allow plaintiff to file a
declaration no later than July 18, 2011, explaining his non-appearance at his scheduled deposition,
non-appearance at the July 11 motion hearing, and failure to comply with this Court’s standing orders
concerning the final pretrial conference. Plaintiff has not filed a declaration or any other pleading to
explain or seek to excuse his non-compliance with the Court’s orders or his failure to oppose the case
dispositive motion filed by defendant. Accordingly, as the Court previously stated it would do under
these circumstances if plaintiff failed timely to respond by the extended date set by the Court, the Court
makes final its July 11, 2011 Order. This matter is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

:
Initials of Preparer

CV-90 (10/08)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

ak

Page 1 of 1