In Re Specific Media Flash Cookie Litig.

Filing 11

STIPULATION to Continue Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference from December 13, 2010 to January 3, 2011 Re: Order, Set/Reset Hearing #7 filed by defendant Specific Media Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Reeves, Jeffrey)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

JEFFREY T. THOMAS, SBN 106409
[e-mail]
JEFFREY H. REEVES, SBN 156648
[e-mail]
JOSHUA A. JESSEN, SBN 222831
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
3161 Michelson Drive
Irvine, California 92612-4412
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
S. ASHLIE BERINGER, SBN 263977
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
1881 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1211
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant SPECIFIC
MEDIA, INC.

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SOUTHERN DIVISION

17
18
19
20
21

GENEVIVE LA COURT; DEIRDRE
HARRIS; CAHILL HOOKER; BILL
LATHROP; JUDY STOUGH; and E.H., a
minor, by and through her parent, JEFF
HALL; individually, on behalf of
themselves and others similarly situated,

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

Plaintiffs,
v.
SPECIFIC MEDIA, INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
Defendant.

Case No. SACV 10-1256 JVS(VBKx)
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE

Honorable James V. Selna

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Genevive La Court, Deirdre Harris, Cahill Hooker, Bill

2

Lathrop, Judy Stough, and E.H., a minor, by and through her parent, Jeff Hall

3

(“Plaintiffs”) filed this putative class action against Specific Media, Inc. (“Defendant”)

4

on August 19, 2010;

5

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs contend that this action is related, pursuant to Civil L.R.

6

83-1.3.1, to In Re Quantcast Advertising Cookie Litigation, Case No. 2:10-CV-05484-

7

GW (JCGx), In Re Clearspring Flash Cookie Litigation, Case No. 2:10-CV-05948-

8

GW (JCGx), and Davis, et al. v. VideoEgg, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-07112-GW-JCG,

9

and should be assigned to the Hon. George H. Wu, who currently presides over each of

10
11

these actions;
WHEREAS, at the request of Judge Wu’s clerk, Plaintiffs’ counsel previously

12

notified the Judge Wu of this action and its related nature, and are filing notices of

13

related cases pursuant to Civil L.R. 83-1.3.1;

14

WHEREAS, Defendant Specific Media disagrees that this discrete action is

15

related to the above-referenced cases, believes that the case should remain before the

16

Hon. James V. Selna, and is filing oppositions to Plaintiffs’ notices of related cases

17

pursuant to Civil L.R. 83-1.3.2;

18

WHEREAS, on November 4, 2010, this Court issued an Order Setting Rule

19

26(f) Scheduling Conference (the “Order”), (i) ordering Plaintiffs to promptly serve

20

the complaint on Defendant, (ii) setting a scheduling conference for December 13,

21

2010 at 11:00 a.m., and (iii) reminding all parties of their obligations under Federal

22

Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) and 26(f);

23
24
25
26

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel and Defendant’s counsel have met and
conferred regarding the Order;
WHEREAS, Defendant’s counsel has agreed to accept service of the complaint,
effective November 19, 2010;

27

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the parties

28

through their respective counsel, and subject to the approval of this Court, as follows:

Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on November 18, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of
electronic filing to the following:
David C Parisi - [e-mail]
Azita Moradmand - [e-mail]

8

/s/Jeffrey H. Reeves
Jeffrey H. Reeves

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

4