Carlos Casim v. Cargill Incorporated et al

Filing 19

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge David O. Carter, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 18 . Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees, except as otherwise may be allocated in the parties settlement agreement. All scheduled dates ordered vacated. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 NO CHANG M BYTH CO TE: ES ADE E URT 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 CARLOS CASIM, Plaintiffs, 12 13 CASE NO. SACV10-01550DOC(MLGx) ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE vs. 14 CARGILL, INCORPORATED, a corporation and DOES 1-25, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Carlos Casim and Defendant Cargill, Incorporated have presented to 18 the Court a stipulation to dismiss this entire action with prejudice, in which they 19 have represented that they have reached a complete resolution of Plaintiff’s claims 20 for relief, memorialized in a confidential settlement agreement and release. 21 Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above- 22 captioned action hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of 23 Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ 24 fees, except as otherwise may be allocated in the parties’ settlement agreement. All 25 scheduled dates ordered vacated. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 DATE: September 22, 2011_ HON. DAVID O. CARTER 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 32902370.1 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?