Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al

Filing 159

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants David Guetta, Frederick Riesterer, Shapiro Bernstein and Co. Motion set for hearing on 12/19/2011 at 10:00 AM before Judge Josephine Staton Tucker. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Memorandum)(Miller, Donald)

Download PDF
1 DONALD A. MILLER (SBN 228753) dmiller@loeb.com 2 BARRY I. SLOTNICK (Pro Hac Vice) bslotnick@loeb.com 3 TAL E. DICKSTEIN (Pro Hac Vice) tdickstein@loeb.com 4 LOEB & LOEB LLP 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2200 5 Los Angeles, California 90067-4120 Telephone: 310-282-2000 6 Facsimile: 310-282-2200 7 Attorneys for SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN & CO., INC., FREDERIC 8 RIESTERER, AND DAVID GUETTA 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SOUTHERN DIVISION 13 BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual, 14 15 Pringle, v. 16 WILLIAM ADAMS, JR.; STACY FERGUSON; ALLAN PINEDA; and 17 JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group The 18 Black Eyed Peas, et al., 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. SACV 10-1656 JST(RZx) Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker Courtroom 10A NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANTS SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN & CO, INC., FREDERIC RIESTERER AND DAVID GUETTA Complaint Filed: October 28, 2010 Trial Date: February 28, 2012 Hearing Date: December 19, 2011; 10:00 AM 23 24 25 26 27 28 NY985326.1 217131-10001 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, that, on December 19, 2011, at 10:00 A.M., or 3 as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard in the courtroom of the Honorable 4 Josephine Staton Tucker, United States District Judge, Central District of California, 5 located at the Santa Ana Courthouse, 411 West Fourth Street, Courtroom 10A, 6 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516, Defendants Shapiro Bernstein & Co., Inc., David 7 Guetta and Frederic Riesterer (collectively “Defendants”), will and hereby do move 8 for an Order, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, granting 9 summary judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff Bryan Pringle. 10 This Motion is made pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil 11 Procedure, Local Rule 56, and this Court’s Initial Standing Order, and is based on 12 this Notice of Motion; Defendants’ Memorandum and Points of Authorities; 13 Defendants’ Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law; the 14 Declarations of Tal E. Dickstein, Paul Geluso, Erik Laykin, Lawrence Ferrara, Clark 15 Warner, David Guetta, Joachim Garraud, Frederic Riesterer, Jean-Charles Carre, 16 Thibaud Fouet, and Gary F. Roth, and all exhibits thereto; the Court file; any reply 17 Defendants may make; and any further papers or argument as may be presented to 18 the Court prior to or at the hearing on this motion, or subsequent thereto as directed 19 by the Court. 20 This motion is made following Defendants’ participation in a conference of 21 counsel pursuant to Local Rule 7-3 on November 1, 2011. 22 Dated: November 17, 2011 LOEB & LOEB LLP 23 By: /s/ Donald A. Miller Donald A. Miller Barry I. Slotnick Tal E. Dickstein 24 25 26 Attorneys for Defendants SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN & CO., INC., FREDERIC RIESTERER and DAVID GUETTA 27 28 NY985326.1 217131-10001 1 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?