Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al
Filing
182
STIPULATION to Continue Hearing Date on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment from January 23, 2012 to January 30, 2012 Re: Order, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, 179 David Guetta, Frederick Riesterer, Shapiro Bernstein and Co. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Donald)
1 DONALD A. MILLER (SBN 228753)
dmiller@loeb.com
2 BARRY I. SLOTNICK (Pro Hac Vice)
bslotnick@loeb.com
3 TAL E. DICKSTEIN (Pro Hac Vice)
tdickstein@loeb.com
4 LOEB & LOEB LLP
10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2200
5 Los Angeles, California 90067-4120
Telephone: 310-282-2000
6 Facsimile: 310-282-2200
7 Attorneys for Defendants SHAPIRO
BERNSTEIN & CO., INC., DAVID
8 GUETTA AND FREDERIC
RIESTERER
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
SOUTHERN DIVISION
BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIAM ADAMS, JR.; STACY
17 FERGUSON; ALLAN PINEDA; and
JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and
18 collectively as the music group The
Black Eyed Peas, et al.,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. SACV 10-1656 JST(RZx)
Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker
Courtroom 10A
STIPULATION REQUESTING
COURT TO CONTINUE HEARING
DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
24
25
26
27
28
NY990919.1
217131-10001
STIPULATION
1
This Stipulation is made by and among counsel for all parties to this action,
2 Plaintiff Bryan Pringle (“Plaintiff”), David Guetta, Frederic Riesterer and Shapiro,
3 Bernstein & Co., Inc. (together the “Guetta Defendants”), William Adams, Allan
4 Pineda, Jaime Gomez, and Stacy Ferguson p/k/a Fergie, all individually and
5 collectively known as the music group The Black Eyed Peas, will.i.am. music llc,
6 Tab Magnetic Publishing, Headphone Junkie Publishing, LLC, Cherry River Music
7 Co., Jeepney Music, Inc., EMI April Music (together the “Adams Defendants”),
8 UMG Recordings, Inc. and Interscope Records (together the “UMG Defendants”),
9 (Plaintiff, the Guetta Defendants, the Adams Defendants and the UMG Defendants
10 are collectively referred to as the “Parties”), and is made with reference to the
11 following facts:
12
1.
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2011, the Guetta Defendants filed a
13 motion for summary judgment (Doc. 159-172) (hereafter “Defendants’ MSJ”) and
14 set a hearing date of December 19, 2011, which was the last date for law and motion
15 hearings under the Court’s February 24, 2011 Case Management Order (Doc. 115).
16
2.
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2011, the Parties submitted a Stipulation
17 and Proposed Order requesting, among other things, that the Court continue the
18 hearing date for Defendants’ MSJ from December 19, 2011 to February 20, 2012.
19
3.
WHEREAS, by Order dated November 22, 2011 (Doc. 179), the Court
20 granted in part and denied in part the Parties’ Stipulation and Proposed Order, and
21 set the hearing date on Defendants’ MSJ for January 23, 2012.
22
4.
WHEREAS, the Guetta Defendants’ lead trial counsel, Barry I.
23 Slotnick, is scheduled to begin a jury trial on January 23, 2012 in the United States
24 District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Mr. Slotnick is also
25 lead trial counsel. That trial is expected to last approximately five days.
26
27
28
NY990919.1
217131-10001
STIPULATION
1
1
5.
WHEREAS, in order to accommodate this scheduling conflict, the
2 Guetta Defendants request a one-week adjournment of the hearing date on the
3 Defendants’ MSJ, from January 23, 2012 to January 30, 2012.
4
6.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff, the Adams Defendants and the UMG Defendants
5 consent to this requested adjournment.
6
7.
WHEREAS, the requested adjournment will not affect any other
7 deadlines in this action, including but not limited to the briefing schedule for
8 Defendants’ MSJ and the pre-trial and trial dates.
9
8.
BASED UPON THE FOREGOING FACTS, IT IS HEREBY
10 STIPULATED AND REQUESTED by and between the Parties, through their
11 respective counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, that the Court’s November 22,
12 2011 Order be modified to continue the hearing date on Defendants’ MSJ from
13 January 23, 2012 to January 30, 2012, at 10:00 am.
14
15 Dated: December 8, 2011
16
17
Donald A. Miller
Barry I. Slotnick
Tal E. Dickstein
LOEB & LOEB LLP
By: /s/ Barry I. Slotnick
Attorneys for Defendants DAVID GUETTA,
FREDERIC RIESTERER and SHAPIRO,
BERNSTEIN & CO., INC.
18
19
20 Dated: December 8, 2011
21
22
Dean A. Dickie
Kathleen E. Koppenhoefer
MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND
STONE, P.L.C.
George L. Hampton IV (State Bar No. 144433)
Colin C. Holley (State Bar No. 191999)
HAMPTONHOLLEY LLP
23
24
By: /s/ Dean Dickie
Attorneys for Plaintiff BRYAN PRINGLE
25
26
27
28
NY990919.1
217131-10001
2
STIPULATION
1 Dated: December 8, 2011
2
3
Linda M. Burrow
Alison Mackenzie
CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC
By: /s/ Linda Burrow
Attorneys for Defendants UMG RECORDINGS,
INC., and INTERSCOPE RECORDS
4
5
6 Dated: December 8, 2011
7
8
9
Kara E. F. Cenar
Jonathan Pink
Justin Righettini
Mariangela Seale
BRYAN CAVE LLP
By:
10
/s/ Kara Cenar
Attorneys for Defendants WILLIAM ADAMS;
ALLAN PINEDA; JAIME GOMEZ, and
STACY FERGUSON p/k/a FERGIE all
individually and collectively as the music group
THE BLACK EYED PEAS; will.i.am music, llc;
TAB MAGNETIC PUBLISHING;
HEADPHONE JUNKIE PUBLISHING, LLC,
CHERRY RIVER MUSIC CO.; JEEPNEY
MUSIC, INC., EMI APRIL MUSIC
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NY990919.1
NY990919.1
217131-10001
3
STIPULATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?