Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al

Filing 218

DECLARATION of Frederic Riesterer in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment 159 Statement of Frederic Riesterer in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants David Guetta, Frederick Riesterer, Shapiro Bernstein and Co. (Miller, Donald)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SOUTHERN DIVISION 5 6 BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual, Plaintiff, 7 8 vs. 9 WILLIAM ADAMS, JR., STACY FERGUSON, ALLAN PINEDA and 10 JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the musical group The 11 Black Eyed Peas, et al., Defendants 12 Case No. SACV 8:10-CV-01656 JST (RZx) STATEMENT OF FREDERIC RIESTERER IN SUPPORT OF A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY THE DEFENDANTS SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN & CO, INC., FREDERIC RIESTERER AND DAVID GUETTA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I, FREDERIC RIESTERER, state the following: 1. I am a musician, author-composer and co-author, with David Guetta, of the music of the hit song “I Gotta Feeling” that was recorded and released by the group The Black Eyed Peas in the spring of 2009. 2. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated hereafter and I submit this statement in support of the motion for summary judgment filed by the Defendants Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., Inc., David Guetta and myself, and to address certain accusations in a statement presented by Mr. Pringle against this motion. 3. As I testified during my June 23, 2011 deposition and in my November 9, 2011 Declaration, I independently created the guitar twang sequence that appears in “I Gotta Feeling” by selecting a guitar preset from Plugsound, composing notes and chords and applying reverb effects using Plugsound, some equalization and compression effects using Logic Pro, and sound distortion effects using the 28 NY994989.1 217131-10001 STATEMENT OF FRÉDÉRIC RIESTERER 1 CamelPhat software, without copying anything produced by Mr. Pringle. In fact, it 2 is my understanding that Mr. Pringle has now admitted that neither I, nor any of the 3 other Defendants could have sampled the guitar twang sequence from Pringle’s song 4 “Take a Dive“ (Dance Version). 5 4. Mr. Pringle is now putting forward certain arguments to explain why he 6 supposedly could not have copied the guitar twang sequence of the isolated guitar 7 part of “I Gotta Feeling” that the Defendants made available on Beatport.com. It is 8 my understanding that Professor Paul Geluso will respond to these arguments and 9 others that were brought up in Mr. Pringle’s most recent statement. However, I 10 submit this Declaration in order to respond to certain accusations Mr. Pringle made 11 concerning alleged “inconsistencies” in the music files I produced and concerning 12 certain statements I made previously as part of this action. 13 5. It is my understanding that Mr. Pringle suggests that the music creation 14 files I produced are not really the original files I used for the music of “I Gotta 15 Feeling” in 2008. In reality, the music creation files I produced, including the 16 “David Pop Guitar” Logic session files, were copied from my backup external hard 17 drives that I use to store my music. The original computer that I used to create the 18 music for “I Gotta Feeling” (which was initially known under the name “David Pop 19 Guitar”) was a Mac Power PC G5. This computer model was available on the 20 market between 2003 and 2006, when it was replaced by the more advanced version 21 Mac Book Pro (Intel). In April 2010, before I became aware of the potential claims 22 of Mr. Pringle, my Mac Power PC G5 being outdated, I gave the computer to a 23 friend, as I often did when I upgrade computer systems. However, as I explained 24 above, I had already saved the “David Pop Guitar” Logic session files and the 25 related music creation files on my external hard drives, which I have actually 26 produced as part of this lawsuit. 27 6. Before producing my music creation files, I opened the “David Pop 28 Guitar” Logic session file to make sure I was to producing the correct file, because I NY994989.1 217131-10001 2 STATEMENT OF FREDERIC RIESTERER 1 have other Logic session files that relate to other songs that are not part of this case. 2 When I opened the “David Pop Guitar” session file, my computer was connected to 3 a Motu 828mk3 Hybrid Firewire/USB Audio Interface I had purchased in the spring 4 of 2011. This is why there is a reference to “828mk3 Hybrid” in the 5 “documentData” file in my “David Pop Guitar” Logic session file. Indeed, the same 6 “documentData” file contains references to other external audio equipment I have 7 used over the years, such as the Roland “JV-1080”, Roland “Juno-106” and “Akai 8 S3200” synthesizers. Thus, the reference to my Motu “828mk3 Hybrid” Audio 9 Interface simply comes from the fact that the “documentData” Logic file is logging 10 the various devices that were connected to my computer over the years. This does 11 not in any way affect the music I created for “I Gotta Feeling”. 12 7. It is my understanding that Mr. Pringle also suggests that a reference to 13 “Disk 1 Tb Litige (def) OK: David Pop Guitar: Audio Files” in my “documentData” 14 Logic file is proof that I altered these Logic files for the purposes addressed in this 15 lawsuit. This is totally untrue. Although the French word “litige” is sometimes used 16 as an equivalent of “litigation”, it is also used to convey the term “disagreement”. 17 While we were creating the music for “I Gotta Feeling”, David Guetta and I were 18 sometimes in disagreement about the sound to be used for that part of the song. To 19 remember that we had to discuss these disagreements before completing the song, I 20 saved the file with the word “litige” and later added “OK” when the disagreement 21 was resolved. 22 8. I also understand that Mr. Pringle is relying on the fact that my music 23 creation files include several creation and alteration dates, including before I started 24 working on the music of “I Gotta Feeling” in 2008 and after “I Gotta Feeling” was 25 released in the spring of 2009. These various file dates can, however, simply be 26 explained by the fact that I stored several music samples that I had created as part of 27 prior musical projects, which is frequent when creating electronic music, and by the 28 NY994989.1 217131-10001 3 STATEMENT OF FREDERIC RIESTERER 1 fact that I later opened and used some of the musical samples for other projects after 2 “I Gotta Feeling” was released. 3 9. Furthermore, none of the files Mr. Pringle mentions match the guitar 4 twang sequence that is the object in this case, but rather, these files are drum sounds 5 and effects settings, such as “Clave Percussion Loop 01.caf”, “loop kick.aif”, 6 “0.6s_Snare Hall.SDIR”, “_VEE Electro Loop 003.wav”, “_VEH3 Clas 001.wav”. 7 The only exception is the file called “Guitar Lead 1.aif”, which is the guitar twang 8 sequence of “I Gotta Feeling” and therefore contains the October 17, 2008 creation 9 date, which is the date at which I started working on the music of “I Gotta Feeling”. 10 10. Lastly, it is my understanding that Mr. Pringle refers to alleged 11 discrepancies between my November 2011 Declaration in support of the 12 Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and a declaration I submitted at the 13 opening of the case in 2010. However, I already explained during my deposition in 14 June 2011 that I misunderstood part of the 2010 declaration, because there was not 15 enough time to translate it into French (my mother tongue) as it had to be filed with 16 the court within less than twenty-four hours in order to respond to an emergency 17 motion filed by Mr. Pringle. 18 11. Specifically, although my 2010 Declaration indicated I took the entire 19 guitar twang sequence from the Plugsound musical library, it was due to the fact I 20 misinterpreted the term “guitar twang sequence” which I thought meant “guitar 21 twang sound”. (Riesterer Deposition 184) (“For me, we are not talking about 22 gimmicks [another word for ‘sequence’], but rather about sounds that I used to 23 create my gimmick, that is how I understood it [in my 2010 statement].”) I also 24 explained, in my June 2011 deposition, as well as in my November 2011 25 Declaration, that although I had used a Plugsound guitar sound, I composed each of 26 the notes and each of the chords of the “I Gotta Feeling” guitar twang sequence 27 (Riesterer Deposition 166), (“Q. And then, did you take the Plugsound sounds and 28 did you play each note, each chord? A. Yes. Q. So I understand, are you saying that NY994989.1 217131-10001 4 STATEMENT OF FREDERIC RIESTERER 1 you composed the sequence of notes using individual sounds from the plug[sound] 2 box? ... A. Yes.”); (November 9, 2011 Riesterer statement, ¶ 7) (“After having 3 selected the ‘Strat with SM57 Stereo Spread’ preset [from Plugsound], I composed 4 each note and each chord of the [“I Gotta Feeling”] guitar twang sequence by 5 playing them on my keyboard”.).1 12. 6 I was therefore surprised to learn that Mr. Pringle continued 7 nevertheless to suggest that I extracted the entire guitar twang sequence of “I Gotta 8 Feeling” from Plugsound and that the guitar twang sequence of “I Gotta Feeling” is 9 the same as that guitar sequence of “Love is Gone”. As I indicated above, both these 10 affirmations are false. I certify, under penalty of perjury, in accordance with the laws of the United 11 12 States of America, that the preceding is true and correct. 13 Executed this 5 day of January 2012, in Paris, France. 14 15 16 17 [signature]____ 18 FREDERIC RIESTERER 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 I also explained in my November 9, 2011 statement that the Plugsound guitar 26 preset I had used to create “I Gotta Feeling” was slightly different from the guitar 27 preset I used to create “Love is Gone”, and that I had used different notes and musical chords, as well as different sound processing effects in “I Gotta Feeling” 28 compared to “Love is Gone” (November 9, 2011 Riesterer statement, ¶¶ 7 n.2, 9). NY994989.1 217131-10001 5 STATEMENT OF FREDERIC RIESTERER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?