Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al

Filing 237

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Sanctions Rule 11 filed by Defendants David Guetta, Frederick Riesterer, Shapiro Bernstein and Co. Motion set for hearing on 4/16/2012 at 10:00 AM before Judge Josephine Staton Tucker. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Affidavit of Service)(Miller, Donald)

Download PDF
1 DONALD A. MILLER (SBN 228753) dmiller@loeb.com 2 BARRY I. SLOTNICK (Pro Hac Vice) bslotnick@loeb.com 3 TAL E. DICKSTEIN (Pro Hac Vice) tdickstein@loeb.com 4 LOEB & LOEB LLP 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2200 5 Los Angeles, California 90067-4120 Telephone: 310-282-2000 6 Facsimile: 310-282-2200 7 Attorneys for SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN & CO., INC., FREDERIC 8 RIESTERER, and DAVID GUETTA 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SOUTHERN DIVISION 13 BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual, 14 15 Plaintiff, v. 16 WILLIAM ADAMS, JR.; STACY FERGUSON; ALLAN PINEDA; and 17 JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group The 18 Black Eyed Peas, et al., 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. SACV 10-1656 JST(RZx) Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker Courtroom 10A NOTICE OF MOTION BY DEFENDANTS SHAPIRO BERNSTEIN & CO., INC., FREDERIC RIESTERER AND DAVID GUETTA FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF AND HIS COUNSEL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 11 Complaint Filed: October 28, 2010 Trial Date: May 8, 2012 Motion Hearing Date: April 16, 2012 23 24 25 26 27 28 NY1000367.2 217131-10001 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 1 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on April 16, 2012 or as soon thereafter as 2 counsel may be heard in the courtroom of the Honorable Josephine Staton Tucker, 3 United States District Judge, Central District of California, located at the Santa Ana 4 Courthouse, 411 West Fourth Street, Courtroom 10A, Santa Ana, California 927015 4516, Defendants Shapiro, Bernstein & Co, Inc., Frederic Riesterer and David 6 Guetta (collectively “Defendants”), will and hereby do move for an Order imposing 7 sanctions on Plaintiff Bryan Pringle and his present and former counsel—Dean A. 8 Dickie and Kathleen E. Koppenhoefer, individually as well as jointly and severally 9 with Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, P.L.C.; Ira P. Gould and Ryan L. Greely, 10 individually as well as jointly and severally with Gould Law Group; and George L. 11 Hampton IV and Colin C. Holley, individually as well as jointly and severally with 12 HamptonHolley LLP. 13 This Motion is made pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil 14 Procedure, the Local Rules of this Court, and is based on this Notice of Motion; 15 Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Sanctions Against 16 Plaintiff and His Counsel Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; the Declaration of Tal E. 17 Dickstein with exhibits thereto; the Court file; any reply Defendants may make; and 18 any further papers or argument as may be presented to the Court prior to or at the 19 hearing on this motion, or subsequent thereto as directed by the Court. 20 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2), this motion and supporting documents 21 were served on Plaintiff’s counsel and all counsel of record on February 6, 2012, 22 more than 21 days prior to the filing of this motion. 23 This motion is made following Defendants’ participation in a conference of 24 counsel pursuant to Local Rule 7-3 held on June 27, 2011, as well as Defendants’ 25 invitation to hold an additional conference of counsel following service of this 26 motion, which invitation was declined by Plaintiff’s counsel. 27 28 NY1000367.2 217131-10001 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 1 1 Dated: March 1, 2012 LOEB & LOEB LLP 2 By: s/ Tal E. Dickstein Donald A. Miller Barry I. Slotnick Tal E. Dickstein 3 4 5 Attorneys for Defendants SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN & CO., INC., FREDERIC RIESTERER and DAVID GUETTA 6 7 NY1000367.2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NY1000367.2 217131-10001 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?