Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al

Filing 90

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker Denying Defendants' Ex Parte Application 82 . On January 10, 2011, Defendants Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., Rister Editions, and David Guetta filed an ex parte application requesting to continue the hearing on the Rule 12 Motions currently scheduled for hearing on January 24, 2011. (Doc. 82). Plaintiff filed an opposition the next day. (Doc. 87). Defendants have failed to show good cause that would require ex parte relief. See generally Mission Power Engg Co. v. Contl Cas. Co., 883 F. Supp. 488 (C.D. Cal. 1995). The Court therefore DENIES Defendants ex parte application. (db)

____________________________________________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SACV 10-1656-JST (RZx)
Title: Bryan Pringle v. William Adams, Jr. et al.

Date: January 12, 2011

Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Ellen Matheson
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF:

Not Present

N/A
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ EX
PARTE APPLICATION (Doc. 82)
On January 10, 2011, Defendants Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., Rister Editions, and
David Guetta filed an ex parte application requesting to continue the hearing on the Rule
12 Motions currently scheduled for hearing on January 24, 2011. (Doc. 82). Plaintiff
filed an opposition the next day. (Doc. 87).
Defendants have failed to show good cause that would require ex parte relief. See
generally Mission Power Eng’g Co. v. Cont’l Cas. Co., 883 F. Supp. 488 (C.D. Cal.
1995). The Court therefore DENIES Defendants’ ex parte application.

Initials of Preparer: enm

______________________________________________________________________________
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
1