Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance PLC et al v. BAX Global Inc et al

Filing 20

ORDER of DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Cormac J. Carney, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 19 . It is hereby Ordered that this action in its entirety is dismissed, with prejudice, and with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs incurred in prosecuting and defending the lawsuit. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rla)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DENNIS A. CAMMARANO/BAR NO. 123662
ASA W. MARKEL/BAR NO. 263029
CAMMARANO LAW GROUP
555 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 501
Long Beach, California 90802
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants,
SCHENKER, INC., and
BAX GLOBAL, INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE
INSURANCE PLC, a United Kingdom
Public Limited Company; CNA
INSURANCE CO LTD, a United
Kingdom Limited Company; and
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING
TO POLICY NO. PC0903196,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
BAX GLOBAL, INC., a corporation;
)
SCHENKER, INC., a corporation; and )
DOES ONE through FIFTY,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________ )

Case No.: SACV10-01829 CJC
(RNBx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
BASED ON STIPULATION

Based on the stipulation between Plaintiffs, ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE

21
22

INSURANCE PLC, a United Kingdom Public Limited Company, CNA

23

INSURANCE CO LTD, a United Kingdom Limited Company and CERTAIN

24

UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO.

25

PC0903196 and Defendants, BAX GLOBAL, INC. and SCHENKER, INC., via

26

//

27

//

28

//
[Proposed] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BASED ON STIPULATION

1

their respective counsel of record, it is hereby Ordered that this action in its

2

entirety is dismissed, with prejudice, and with each party to bear its own attorney’s

3

fees and costs incurred in prosecuting and defending the lawsuit.

4
5
6

Dated: October 18, 2011

United States District Court Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BASED ON STIPULATION

Page 2