Larry Singer v. Live Nation Worldwide Inc et al

Filing 14

(IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge David O. Carter: WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT GRANT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS UNOPPOSED: Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why this Court should not grant the Motion for Summary Judgment as unopposed p ursuant to Local Rules 7-9 and 7-12. Plaintiff may file an Opposition on or before March 12, 2012, and such a filing shall be deemed sufficient to discharge this Order to Show Cause, with no other explanation required. The Court expresses no view on whether Defendant's Motion violates the local rules or whether the Court should alter the scheduling order to permit Defendant to file this Motion. See Mot. at 4-5. If Plaintiff does file an opposition by March 12, 2012, Defendant's Reply shall be due on or before March 15, 2012. (rla)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No. SA CV 11-0427 DOC (MLGx)

Date: March 6, 2012

Title: LARRY SINGER -V- LIVE NATION WORLDWIDE INC., ET AL.
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE
Julie Barrera
Courtroom Clerk

Not Present
Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
NONE PRESENT

NONE PRESENT

PROCEEDING (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT
GRANT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS
UNOPPOSED
Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 13) filed on February 22,
2012, by Defendant Live Nation Worldwide (“Defendant”). Defendant’s previous motion for summary
judgment was denied. See Order (Dkt. 12).
Plaintiff’s Opposition to the present Motion for Summary Judgment was due on March 5,
2012. At present, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why this Court should not
grant the Motion for Summary Judgment as unopposed pursuant to Local Rules 7-9 and 7-12. Plaintiff
may file an Opposition on or before March 12, 2012, and such a filing shall be deemed sufficient to
discharge this Order to Show Cause, with no other explanation required. The Court expresses no view
on whether Defendant’s Motion violates the local rules or whether the Court should alter the scheduling
order to permit Defendant to file this Motion. See Mot. at 4-5.
If Plaintiff does file an opposition by March 12, 2012, Defendant’s Reply shall be due on
or before March 15, 2012.

MINUTES FORM 11 DOC
CIVIL - GEN

Initials of Deputy Clerk: jcb
Page 1 of 1