Allergan Inc v. Merz Pharmaceuticals LLC et al

Filing 371

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 370 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLERGAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. MERZ PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, a North Carolina corporation, et al., 18 19 22 23 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE MERZ PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, MERZ AESTHETICS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Counterclaimants, 20 21 Assigned for all purposes to Honorable Andrew J. Guilford Defendants. 16 17 Case No. SACV11-446 AG (Ex) v. ALLERGAN, INC., a Delaware corporation, Counterdefendant. 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 ORDER 2 Upon the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Dismissal without Prejudice, and 3 pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), IT IS 4 HEREBY ORDERED that the following claims be dismissed without prejudice: 5 6 7 (a) The fifth cause of action asserted in Allergan, Inc.’s Third Amended Complaint, for violation of Lanham Act § 43(a); (b) The portion of the fourth cause of action asserted in Allergan, Inc.’s Third 8 Amended Complaint, for interference with prospective economic advantage based 9 on the advertisement of Xeomin; and 10 11 12 (c) All three causes of action asserted in Merz Pharmaceuticals, LLC’s and Merz Aesthetics, Inc.’s Second Amended Counterclaim. SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 Dated: _October 10, 2012____ Hon. Andrew J. Guilford United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?