Richard Collender et al v. City of Brea et al

Filing 41

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman re Notice (Other) 40 . See Order for more information. (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RICHARD A. COLLENDER, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 12 vs. Case No. SACV 11-00530-AG (MLGx) [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 CITY OF BREA, et al., Defendants. 14 15 PROTECTIVE ORDER 16 17 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY 18 ORDERED as follows: 19 1. 20 Plaintiff served requests for production of documents on City of Brea GOOD CAUSE: PURPOSE AND SCOPE 21 (“CITY”); in response thereto, CITY is producing documents deemed privileged 22 and/or confidential, specifically, (i) all use of force reports authored or signed by 23 Defendant Officers prior to or subsequent to the incident; (ii) all documents that 24 relate or refer to prior and subsequent incidents in which Defendant Officers 25 authored or signed a use of force report; (iii) all use of force reports, citizen 26 complaints, and internal investigations that relate or refer to prior and subsequent 27 incidents in which Defendant Officers struck an individual; (iv) documents that 28 relate or refer to prior and subsequent incidents in which Defendant Neel SACV 11-00530-AG (MLGx) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 discharged a firearm at an individual; (v) all use of force reports, supplemental 2 use of force reports, citizen complaints and internal affairs investigations found 3 in internal affairs and personnel files that relate or refer to prior and subsequent 4 incidents in which Defendant Officers are alleged to have wrongfully handcuffed 5 an individual(s); (vi) all use of force reports, supplemental use of force reports, 6 citizen complaints and internal affairs investigations found in internal affairs and 7 personnel files that relate or refer to prior and subsequent incidents in which 8 Defendant Officers are alleged to have too tightly handcuffed an individual(s); 9 (vii) all use of force reports, supplemental use of force reports, citizen complaints 10 and internal affairs investigations found in internal affairs and personnel files that 11 relate or refer to prior and subsequent incidents in which Defendant Officers 12 pushed or shoved an individual(s); (viii) all use of force reports, supplemental 13 use of force reports, citizen complaints and internal affairs investigations found 14 in internal affairs and personnel files that relate or refer to prior and subsequent 15 incidents in which Defendant Officers pushed or slammed an individual against a 16 car; (ix) all documents referring or relating to complaints for use of force, false 17 reporting, failure to properly report, and lack of truthfulness against Defendant 18 Officers, however so generated; (x) all documents referring or relating to 19 investigations of complaints for use of force, false reporting, failure to properly 20 report, and lack of truthfulness against Defendant Officers however so generated; 21 and (xi) the video depicting the shooting that is the subject of Plaintiffs’ lawsuit. 22 The CITY claims that the requested documents and video are protected by the 23 officers’ right to privacy and subject to the official information privilege. 24 Documents and video produced under these designations, as well as 25 information extracted therefrom, shall be referred to as “Confidential Information,” 26 and shall be subject to this Protective Order. 27 28 -2- SACV 11-00530-AG (MLGx) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2. 2 The confidentiality obligations imposed by this Protective Order shall remain DURATION 3 in effect even after the termination of this litigation, and shall not be lifted without 4 further order of this Court. 5 This Order shall survive the final termination of this action, to the extent that 6 the information contained in “Confidential Information” is not or does not become 7 known to the public, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve any dispute 8 concerning the use of the information disclosed hereunder. Within sixty (60) 9 calendar days after the conclusion of this action in its entirety (including expiration 10 of appeal periods or the execution of a settlement agreement among the parties 11 finally disposing of this action), all parties and persons having received 12 “Confidential Information” shall dispose of all such material either by (i) returning 13 such material to counsel for the producing party, or (ii) destroying such material in a 14 manner that ensures that it will not be disclosed to or disseminated or received by 15 any person. Upon request, Plaintiffs, the CITY, and their counsel shall separately 16 provide written certification to any producing party making the request that such 17 disposal has been completed. Counsel for the parties shall be entitled to retain all 18 court papers, deposition and trial transcripts, exhibits used in affidavits, at 19 depositions, and at trial, and attorney work-product, including materials which 20 contain, quote, discuss, or analyze “Confidential Information”, provided that such 21 counsel and employees of such counsel shall not disclose such materials to any 22 person unless, after reasonable prior notice to the producing party, the disclosing 23 counsel has obtained permission pursuant to court order or by agreement of the 24 producing party. The “Confidential Information” kept by counsel pursuant to this 25 paragraph shall be maintained in accordance with the terms of this Order. Unless 26 otherwise agreed, outside counsel for each party may retain archival copies of all 27 “Confidential Information” marked as an exhibit during a deposition, used at a 28 -3- SACV 11-00530-AG (MLGx) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 hearing or at trial, or filed with the Court, and this Order shall remain in force with 2 respect to such material. 3 3. 4 DESIGNATED CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 3.1. Each party or non-party that designates Confidential Information 5 for protection under this Protective Order shall ensure that such 6 designation is not over-broad, and applies only to those 7 materials, documents, items, or communications (or portions 8 thereof) for which such protection is warranted. 9 3.2. 10 Information may qualify as Confidential Information only if it has not been made public. 11 3.3. Confidential Information protected by this Protective Order must 12 be clearly designated prior to the disclosure or production of 13 such Confidential Information, and must bear the notation of 14 “Confidential” on each page that contains Confidential 15 Information, provided that such notation does not obscure or 16 obliterate the document contents. 17 3.4. An inadvertent failure to designated Confidential Information 18 does not waive the producing party’s right to secure protection 19 under this Protective Order. If the producing party discovers 20 after production of the Confidential Information that the 21 information is lacking the appropriate designation, the producing 22 party must timely notify the receiving party, who shall make 23 reasonable effort to ensure that the Confidential Information is 24 treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 25 26 4. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE OF INFORMATION 4.1. Under no circumstances shall Confidential Information be used 27 in any proceeding other than the instant case or be disseminated, 28 in any form, except by order of this Court. Confidential -4- SACV 11-00530-AG (MLGx) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Information must be stored and maintained by the receiving 2 party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access 3 is limited to the person authorized under this Protective Order. 4 4.2. Immediately upon production of Confidential Information, 5 attorneys for the receiving party shall personally secure and 6 maintain the Confidential Information in their possession. The 7 Confidential Information shall not, under any circumstances, be 8 left in an open or unsecured location where unauthorized persons 9 (such as unauthorized employees of counsel, cleaning personnel, 10 11 etc.) might have access to them. 4.3. Confidential information and information derived therefrom may 12 not be disclosed in any form to anyone not covered under this 13 protective order. 14 4.4. Disclosure of Confidential Information designated 15 “Confidential” shall be limited to the personnel and/or 16 classification of persons listed below: 17 4.4.1. Richard Collender, Yen Collender, City of Brea, 18 Defendants Neel, Dickinson, Parker, Phillips, Leever, 19 Tinnin, Garduna and Montgomery, and the counsel for 20 these parties; 21 22 23 24 25 4.4.2. staff and personnel employed by counsel for the parties listed in Paragraph 4.4.1; 4.4.3. the Court and court personnel, in connection with this litigation; 4.4.4. during their depositions, witnesses who, from the face of 26 the document, appear to have previously authored or 27 received it; and 28 -5- SACV 11-00530-AG (MLGx) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 4.4.5. experts or consultants retained/consulted to work on this 2 case by counsel for any party to this action (so long as 3 each such expert or consultant agrees, in writing, to be 4 bound by the terms of this Protective Order). 5 4.5. Confidential Information that a party intends to use in support of 6 or in opposition to a pre-trial filing with the Court must be filed 7 in accordance with the Central District of California Local Rules 8 relating to under seal filings, including Local Rule 79-5. 9 Counsel intending to use Confidential Information must both (a) 10 submit unredacted documents containing Confidential 11 Information under seal and (b) file public versions of the same 12 documents with the Confidential Information redacted. 13 4.6. Except as set forth in paragraph 4.4.1, counsel for any party to 14 this action shall advise those individuals to whom disclosure of 15 Confidential Information is to be made of the contents of this 16 Protective Order, and such counsel shall obtain the consent of 17 such individual that he or she will be bound by this Protective 18 Order, prior to disclosure of Confidential Information. In the 19 event such individual does not consent to be bound by this 20 Protective Order, no disclosure of Confidential Information shall 21 be made to that individual. 22 4.6.1. The foregoing provision shall not apply to the disclosure 23 of Confidential Information to the Court or the Court’s 24 staff. 25 4.7. Any counsel, expert, consultant or investigator retained by 26 counsel for any party to this case shall not refer to Confidential 27 Information in any other court proceeding without further order 28 of this Court. -6- SACV 11-00530-AG (MLGx) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 4.8. In the case of depositions, any party may request that all or any 2 portion of the deposition testimony given in this litigation be 3 designated as Confidential Information orally during the 4 deposition. Further, to the extent that Confidential Information 5 may be identified or referred to in depositions in this case, the 6 court reporter transcribing the deposition shall agree to be bound 7 by the Protective Order. Any questions intended to elicit 8 testimony regarding the contents of the Confidential Information 9 shall be conducted only in the presence of persons authorized to 10 review the Confidential Information as provided in this Order. 11 Any deposition transcript containing such questions and 12 testimony shall be subject to the same protections and 13 precautions applicable to the Confidential Information. 14 4.9. 15 The parties shall meet and confer to discuss redactions of particularly sensitive information before making use thereof. 16 4.10. Nothing in this Order shall be construed as authorizing a party to 17 disobey a lawful subpoena issued in another action. 18 4.11. In the event that a party receives a subpoena, discovery request, 19 or other legal process seeking Confidential Information produced 20 by another party, the subpoenaed party must give prompt written 21 notice to the party that disclosed the Confidential Information. 22 The subpoenaed party shall inform the person or entity seeking 23 the information of the existence of this Protective Order. 24 5. CHALLENGES TO DESIGNATION OF CONFIDENTIAL 25 INFORMATION 26 5.1. Should a party challenge the confidentiality of information so 27 designated, that party must do so in good faith, and shall confer 28 directly with counsel for the producing party. -7- SACV 11-00530-AG (MLGx) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 5.2. If the parties are unable to resolve the designation informally, the 2 party challenging the designation may file and serve a motion 3 under Civil Local Rules 37-1 and 37-2, including the Joint 4 Stipulation requirement (and in compliance with Civil Local 5 Rule 79-5, if applicable), identifying the basis for the challenge. 6 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall 7 be on the party designating Confidential Information. The 8 designation of the challenged information shall remain 9 unchanged until the Court rules on the challenge. 10 6. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL 11 INFORMATION 12 6.1. If a receiving party learns that it has disclosed Confidential 13 Information to any person or entity not authorized to receive 14 such information pursuant to this Protective Order, the receiving 15 party shall immediately (a) notify the producing party of the 16 unauthorized disclosure, including identification of the person or 17 entity to whom such unauthorized disclosure was made, (b) 18 retrieve all copies of the Confidential Information from the 19 unauthorized recipient, (c) inform the unauthorized recipient of 20 the terms of this Protective Order and request that they agree, in 21 writing, to be bound hereto. Should the Court determine that the 22 receiving party intentionally disclosed Confidential Information 23 to an unauthorized party, the Court may consider the imposition 24 of sanctions, including but not limited to monetary sanctions 25 and/or issue preclusion. 26 6.2. Under no circumstances shall the receiving party file in the 27 public record any Confidential Information, without written 28 permission from the producing party or an Order of this Court, -8- SACV 11-00530-AG (MLGx) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 and only upon timely written notice to all interested parties. The 2 parties shall meet and confer to discuss redactions of particularly 3 sensitive information. 4 5 7. RIGHT TO ASSERT OBJECTIONS 7.1. By the entry of this Protective Order, the parties are not waiving 6 any rights that they might otherwise have to objecting to 7 disclosure or production of information on any ground not 8 addressed herein. The parties do not waive any right to object to 9 the use in evidence of the material covered by this Protective 10 Order. 11 12 This Order may not be modified unless by written consent of the parties and 13 approval of the Court. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 DATED: September 6, 2012 17 18 19 Hon. Marc L. Goldman United States Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -9- SACV 11-00530-AG (MLGx) PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Approved as to form and content: 2 3 DATED: September 6, 2012 4 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO By: 5 Dale K. Galipo Attorneys for Plaintiffs RICHARD A. COLLENDER and YEN P. COLLENDER 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 DATED: September 6, 2012 RICHARDS, WATSON & GERSHON By: Jennifer Petrusis Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF BREA, NEEL, DICKINSON, PARKER, PHILLIPS, LEEVER, TINNIN, GARDUNA AND MONTGOMERY 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -8- SACV 11-00530-AG (MLGx) PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?