National Organization of Assistance for Homeowners of California v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al
Filing
14
ORDER by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker: re Joint Stipulation Regarding Dismissal of Case and Response to OSC 13 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mt)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF
ASSISTANCE FOR HOMEOWNERS
OF CALIFORNIA a dba FINANCIAL
WELLNESS FOR HOMEOWNERS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
CORPORATION a Non-Profit
Homeowner Organization representing
Individual Members; ZUHEY
APARICIO, GUILLERMO AQUINO,
BRUCE BAHN, VILMA BARERRA,
FRANCES CAO, PEDRO
CARBAJAL, CONRADO CORPUZ,
ROLLY CHENG, RUSS CHICO,
MANUEL CRUZ, FLORDELIZA
CANILAS, FLORO ESPINOSA,
ANTONIO ESPINOZA, BUENA
ESCANO, ABDELLAH HACHIMI,
JESUS HERNANDEZ, CARLOS
HERRERA, MARIA JIMENEZ, KHE
LE, PATRICIO SULIT, TRINH MAI,
VIOLETA J. MONTERO,
CONCETTA MCBRIDE, ORALIA
ONTIVEROS, THOMAS POWELL,
CARMELITA SUSBILLA, JESUS
{DN092035;1}
Case No. 8:11-cv-00578-JST (RNBx)
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF
CASE AND RESPONSE TO OSC
[Filed concurrently with Proposed
Order]
1
CASE NO. SACV 11-578-JST-RNBX
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CASE AND RESPONSE TO OSC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
SAN ROQUE, DANIEL SUTTON,
JACK TRAN, LUCIA TUQUERO,
STEPHANIE TAGUDAR, BOBBIE
WILSON, JULIANN MINHTHAO
TRAN, JACK TRAN, ILUMINADA
RETUTA, RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ,
MIGUEL LINA, MARIA
RODRIGUEZ, MARIA ZETA
TORRES, SUMIKAT DE JESUS, LIZ
MAGBUAL, VIVENCIA OBISPO,
MICHELLE CABESAS, KUM SOO
SEOL, NICK BARIT, CHELSEA
TAE-RYOUNG PARK, SHIRLEY
BERNALDEZ, DIOSDADO
SADANGSAL, GUILLERMO GUCE,
CARILITO MENDOZA, EMERALDA
MACTAL, MARTHA ESPINOZA,
EULOGIA QUAILE, SHERRYL
LISING, ROBERT RUBIO, JOEL
SALVADOR, PHUONG TRAN,
MICHAEL MCCARTHY; individuals,,
on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated ROES 60 through
1000, inclusive,
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiffs,
v.
AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC, a
Delaware corporation;, and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,
23
24
25
26
27
Defendants.
Having read the JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF
CASE AND RESPONSE TO OSC, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS
28
{DN092035;1}
2
CASE NO. SACV 11-578-JST-RNBX
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CASE AND RESPONSE TO OSC
1
ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved. This matter is dismissed
2
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: June 21, 2011
6
________________________________________
7
Hon. Josephine S. Tucker
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{DN092035;1}
3
CASE NO. SACV 11-578-JST-RNBX
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CASE AND RESPONSE TO OSC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?