National Organization of Assistance for Homeowners of California v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al

Filing 14

ORDER by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker: re Joint Stipulation Regarding Dismissal of Case and Response to OSC 13 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mt)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF ASSISTANCE FOR HOMEOWNERS OF CALIFORNIA a dba FINANCIAL WELLNESS FOR HOMEOWNERS OF ORANGE COUNTY CORPORATION a Non-Profit Homeowner Organization representing Individual Members; ZUHEY APARICIO, GUILLERMO AQUINO, BRUCE BAHN, VILMA BARERRA, FRANCES CAO, PEDRO CARBAJAL, CONRADO CORPUZ, ROLLY CHENG, RUSS CHICO, MANUEL CRUZ, FLORDELIZA CANILAS, FLORO ESPINOSA, ANTONIO ESPINOZA, BUENA ESCANO, ABDELLAH HACHIMI, JESUS HERNANDEZ, CARLOS HERRERA, MARIA JIMENEZ, KHE LE, PATRICIO SULIT, TRINH MAI, VIOLETA J. MONTERO, CONCETTA MCBRIDE, ORALIA ONTIVEROS, THOMAS POWELL, CARMELITA SUSBILLA, JESUS {DN092035;1} Case No. 8:11-cv-00578-JST (RNBx) ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CASE AND RESPONSE TO OSC [Filed concurrently with Proposed Order] 1 CASE NO. SACV 11-578-JST-RNBX ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CASE AND RESPONSE TO OSC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 SAN ROQUE, DANIEL SUTTON, JACK TRAN, LUCIA TUQUERO, STEPHANIE TAGUDAR, BOBBIE WILSON, JULIANN MINHTHAO TRAN, JACK TRAN, ILUMINADA RETUTA, RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ, MIGUEL LINA, MARIA RODRIGUEZ, MARIA ZETA TORRES, SUMIKAT DE JESUS, LIZ MAGBUAL, VIVENCIA OBISPO, MICHELLE CABESAS, KUM SOO SEOL, NICK BARIT, CHELSEA TAE-RYOUNG PARK, SHIRLEY BERNALDEZ, DIOSDADO SADANGSAL, GUILLERMO GUCE, CARILITO MENDOZA, EMERALDA MACTAL, MARTHA ESPINOZA, EULOGIA QUAILE, SHERRYL LISING, ROBERT RUBIO, JOEL SALVADOR, PHUONG TRAN, MICHAEL MCCARTHY; individuals,, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated ROES 60 through 1000, inclusive, 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiffs, v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC, a Delaware corporation;, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 23 24 25 26 27 Defendants. Having read the JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CASE AND RESPONSE TO OSC, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS 28 {DN092035;1} 2 CASE NO. SACV 11-578-JST-RNBX ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CASE AND RESPONSE TO OSC 1 ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved. This matter is dismissed 2 WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: June 21, 2011 6 ________________________________________ 7 Hon. Josephine S. Tucker United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {DN092035;1} 3 CASE NO. SACV 11-578-JST-RNBX ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CASE AND RESPONSE TO OSC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?