IP Power Holdings Limited v. Bam Brokerage Inc et al

Filing 63

AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. This Protective Order is issued to facilitate document disclosure and production under the Local Rules of this Court and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Order for details) 58 61 , 62 (bem)

Download PDF
1 MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 2000 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-3383 TELEPHONE: 213-629-7611 FACSIMILE 213-624-1376 2 3 4 5 Reid E. Dammann (State Bar No. 249031) r.dammann@mpglaw.com Attorneys for IP Power Holdings Limited, LTD. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 IP Power Holdings Limited, LTD., CASE No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) Plaintiff, AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 vs. 13 14 BAM Brokerage, Inc. Defendant. 15 16 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 899966.1 1 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS ANx AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 This Protective Order is issued to facilitate document disclosure and production 3 under the Local Rules of this Court and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Unless 4 modified pursuant to the terms of this Order or by further Order of the Court, this 5 Order shall remain in effect both through and after this conclusion of this litigation. 6 The Plaintiff IP Power Holdings Limited Ltd (“Plaintiff”) herein anticipates that 7 documents, testimony, and information containing or reflecting confidential, 8 proprietary, trade secret, or commercially sensitive information are likely to be 9 disclosed in this litigation, and request that the Court enter this Order setting forth the 10 conditions for the disclosures, treatment, and use of such information. Therefore, 11 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), the Court finds good cause for and 12 enters this Protective Order (“Order”). 13 1. 14 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 15 of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from 16 public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation 17 would be warranted. Accordingly, the Plaintiff hereby to and petitions the Court to 18 enter the following Protective Order. The Plaintiff acknowledges that this Order does 19 not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 20 protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled 21 under the applicable legal principles to treatment as confidential. The Plaintiff further 22 acknowledges, as set forth in Section 10, below, that this Protective Order creates no 23 entitlement to file confidential information under seal; Central District Civil Local 24 Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards 25 that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material 26 under seal. 27 /// 28 /// 899966.1 2 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2. 2 DEFINITIONS 2.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, 3 directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their 4 support staff). 5 2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, 6 regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, 7 among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or 8 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 9 2.3 “Confidential” Information or Items: information (regardless of 10 how generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 11 under standards developed under F.R.Civ.P. 26(c). 12 2.4 “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eves Only” Information or 13 Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” whose disclosure to 14 another Party or non- party would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could 15 not be avoided by less restrictive means. 16 17 2.5 Material from a Producing Party. 18 19 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 2.6 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 20 2.7 Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates 21 information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 22 “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 23 24 2.8 designated as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 25 26 2.9 Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 27 28 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 2.10 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. /// 899966.1 3 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 2.11 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well as their support staffs). 3 2.12 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a 4 matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to 5 serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action and who is not a past or a 6 current employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party’s and who, at the time of 7 retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or a competitor of a 8 Party’s. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained in 9 connection with this litigation. 10 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 11 support services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or 12 demonstrations; organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and 13 their employees and subcontractors. 14 3. 15 The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material (as SCOPE 16 defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all 17 copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, 18 or presentations by parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that might 19 reveal Protected Material. 20 4. 21 Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations DURATION 22 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees 23 otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. 24 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 25 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 26 Each Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this 27 Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies 28 under the appropriate standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for 899966.1 4 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written 2 communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, 3 items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 4 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 5 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. 6 Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an 7 improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development 8 process, or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties), expose the 9 Designating Party to sanctions. 10 If it comes to a Party’s or a non-party’s attention that information or 11 items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not 12 qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must 13 promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 14 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in 15 this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise or 16 ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 17 designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 18 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 19 (a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of 20 depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the 21 legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 22 ONLY” at the top of each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or 23 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 24 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in 25 the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted 26 (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 27 ONLY”). 28 /// 899966.1 5 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials 2 available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the 3 inspecting Party has indicated which material it would like copied and produced. 4 During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available 5 for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –ATTORNEYS’ EYES 6 ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and 7 produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, 8 qualify for protection under this Order, then, before producing the specified 9 documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend 10 (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 11 ONLY”) at the top of each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or 12 portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 13 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in 14 the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted 15 (either “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 16 ONLY”). 17 (b) for testimony given in discovery proceedings, that the Party or 18 non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, before the close 19 of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further 20 specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 21 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” When it is impractical to identify separately each 22 portion of testimony that is entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial 23 portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Party or non-party that 24 sponsors, offers, or gives the testimony may invoke on the record (before the 25 deposition or proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to 25 days after the reporter's 26 preparation of the transcript to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to 27 which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted 28 (“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 899966.1 6 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 ONLY”). Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for 2 protection within those 25 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Protective 3 Order. 4 Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately 5 bound by the court reporter, who must affix to the top of the first page the legend 6 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 7 ONLY,” as instructed by the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the witness or 8 presenting the testimony. 9 Testimony provided at pretrial or trial proceedings will be taken up 10 with the presiding judicial officer at the appropriate time how confidential materials 11 will be handled in those proceedings. This protective order will only apply to 12 discovery proceedings. 13 (c) for information produced in some form other than 14 documentary, and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a 15 prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information 16 or item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 17 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only portions of the information or item warrant 18 protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected 19 portions, specifying whether they qualify as “Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential 20 – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.” 21 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent 22 failure to designate qualified information or items as “Confidential” or “Highly 23 Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating 24 Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. If material is 25 appropriately designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes 26 Only” after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely 27 notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the 28 material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 899966.1 7 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 6. 2 CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a 3 Designating Party’s confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable 4 substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a later significant disruption 5 or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality 6 designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original 7 designation is disclosed. 8 9 6.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must 10 begin the process by conferring with counsel for the Designating Party regarding each 11 disputed designation. In conferring, the challenging Party must explain the basis for 12 its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the 13 Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the 14 circumstances, and if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the 15 chosen designation. A challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the 16 challenge process only if it has first engaged in this meet and confer process, which 17 may initially involve written communication, but must, before proceeding to the next 18 stage of the challenge process, involve some form of direct voice-to-voice dialogue 19 either in person or over the telephone. The parties must comply with Local Rule 37 20 before filing any discovery motion, to the extent possible, under this section. 21 6.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a 22 confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the 23 Designating Party may file and serve a motion in accordance with the appropriate 24 local rules that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for 25 the challenge. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration 26 that affirms that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements 27 imposed in paragraph 6.2 hereof and that sets forth with specificity the justification for 28 899966.1 8 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 the confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating Party in the meet 2 and confer process. 3 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on 4 the Designating Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue 5 to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under 6 the Producing Party’s designation. The parties must comply with Local Rule 37 before 7 filing any discovery motion, to the extent possible, under this section. 8 7. 9 ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material 10 that is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with 11 this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such 12 Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the 13 conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a 14 Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 11, below (FINAL 15 DISPOSITION). 16 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at 17 a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 18 authorized under this Order. 19 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 20 otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 21 Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL 22 only to: 23 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, 24 as well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose 25 the information for this litigation; 26 27 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this 28 899966.1 9 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 litigation and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” 2 (Exhibit A); 3 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to 4 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 5 “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 6 (d) the Court and its personnel; 7 (e) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom 8 disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 9 “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); 10 (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom 11 disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Agreement to Be Bound 12 by Protective Order” (Exhibit A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or 13 exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the 14 court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this 15 Protective Order; 16 (g) the author of the document or the original source of the 17 information, as well as persons who received or likely received a copy of the 18 document. 19 7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 20 EYES ONLY” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or 21 permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any 22 information or item designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 23 ONLY” only to: 24 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, 25 as well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose 26 the information for this litigation; 27 /// 28 /// 899966.1 10 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 (b) Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is 2 reasonably necessary for this litigation, and (2) as to whom the procedures set forth in 3 paragraph 7.4, below, have been followed; 4 (c) the Court and its personnel; 5 (d) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom 6 disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 7 “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” (Exhibit A); and 8 9 10 (e) the author of the document or the original source of the information, as well as persons who received or likely received a copy of the document. 11 12 7.4 Procedures for Approving Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items to “Experts” 13 (a) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed in writing by 14 the Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an “Expert” (as defined in this 15 Order) any information or item that has been designated “HIGHLY 16 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” first must make a written request 17 to the Designating Party that (1) identifies the specific HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 18 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information that the Receiving Party seeks permission 19 to disclose to the Expert, (2) sets forth the full name of the Expert and the city and 20 state of his or her primary residence, (3) attaches a copy of the Expert’s current 21 resume, (4) identifies the Expert’s current employer(s), (5) identifies each person or 22 entity from whom the Expert has received compensation for work in his or her areas 23 of expertise or to whom the expert has provided professional services at any time 24 during the preceding five years, and (6) identifies (by name and number of the case, 25 filing date, and location of court) any litigation in connection with which the Expert 26 has provided any professional services during the preceding five years. 27 Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Party that seeks to make such a disclosure to an 28 899966.1 11 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Expert that is an attorney shall not be required to comply with the foregoing 2 requirements (5) and (6) of this paragraph. 3 (b) A Party that makes a request and provides the information 4 specified in the preceding paragraph may disclose the subject Protected Material to the 5 identified Expert unless, within seven court days of delivering the request, the Party 6 receives a written objection from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set 7 forth in detail the grounds on which it is based. 8 (c) A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and 9 confer with the Designating Party (through direct voice-to-voice dialogue) to try to 10 resolve the matter by agreement. If no agreement is reached, the Party seeking to 11 make the disclosure to the Expert may file a motion in accordance with the 12 appropriate local rules seeking permission from the Court to do so. Any such motion 13 must describe the circumstances with specificity, set forth in detail the reasons for 14 which the disclosure to the Expert is reasonably necessary, assess the risk of harm that 15 the disclosure would entail and suggest any additional means that might be used to 16 reduce that risk. In addition, any such motion must be accompanied by a competent 17 declaration in which the movant describes the parties’ efforts to resolve the matter by 18 agreement (i.e., the extent and the content of the meet and confer discussions) and sets 19 forth the reasons advanced by the Designating Party for its refusal to approve the 20 disclosure. The parties must comply with Local Rule 37 before filing any discovery 21 motion, to the extent possible, under this section. 22 In any such proceeding the Party opposing disclosure to the Expert 23 shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail 24 (under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need to disclose the 25 Protected Material to its Expert. 26 27 28 899966.1 12 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED 2 PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION. 3 If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other 4 litigation that would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this 5 action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 6 EYES ONLY,” the Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing 7 (by fax, if possible) immediately in no event more than three court days after 8 receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the 9 subpoena or court order. 10 The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party 11 who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the 12 material covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In 13 addition, the Receiving Party must deliver a copy of this Protective Order promptly to 14 the Party in the other action that caused the subpoena or order to issue. 15 The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to 16 the existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case 17 an opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the 18 subpoena or order issued. The Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the 19 expenses of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing 20 in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving 21 Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 22 9. 23 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 24 Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 25 Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the 26 Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all 27 copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom 28 unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request 899966.1 13 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be 2 Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3 10. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL. 4 Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order secured 5 after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public 6 record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 7 Protected Material must comply with Central District Civil Local Rule 79-5. 8 11. 9 Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within FINAL DISPOSITION. 10 sixty days after the final termination of this action, each Receiving Party must return 11 all Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, “all 12 Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any 13 other form of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. With 14 permission in writing from the Designating Party, the Receiving Party may destroy 15 some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether the Protected 16 Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written 17 certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the 18 Designating Party) by the sixty-day deadline that identifies (by category, where 19 appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms 20 that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, 21 summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. 22 Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all 23 pleadings, motion papers, discovery requests, responses to discovery requests, 24 transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, attorney work product, and expert 25 reports, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies 26 that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as 27 set forth in section 4 (DURATION), above. 28 /// 899966.1 14 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 12. 2 3 MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 4 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By entry of this Protective 5 Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or 6 producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Protective 7 Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in 8 evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. 9 10 11 IT IS SO , THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. DATED: June 3, 2014 MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP 12 13 By: /s/ Reid E. Dammann Reid E. Dammann Attorneys for IP Power Holdings Limited, LTD. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 899966.1 15 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER ORDER 1 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 DATED: June 4, 2014 8 9 Honorable Jean P. Rosenbluth United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 899966.1 16 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER EXHIBIT A 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 2 3 I, _______________________________ [print or type full name], 4 of _____________________________________ [print or type full address], declare 5 under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Protective 6 Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of 7 California in the case of IP Power Holdings Limited, Ltd. v. Bam Brokerage, Inc. Case 8 No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the 9 terms of this Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so 10 comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I 11 solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is 12 subject to this Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with 13 the provisions of this Order. 14 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court 15 for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this 16 Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this 17 action. 18 I hereby appoint ________________________ [print or type full name] of 19 _____________________________________ [print or type full address and 20 telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with 21 this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Protective Order. 22 23 Date: ________________________________ 24 25 City and State where sworn and signed: ___________________________________ Printed name: [printed name] 26 Signature: 27 [signature] 28 899966.1 17 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER PROOF OF SERVICE 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 2 3 At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this 4 action. I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My 5 business address is One Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2000, Los Angeles, California 6 90017-3383. 7 On June 3, 2014, I served true copies of the following document(s) 8 described as AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER on the interested 9 11 parties in this action as follows: Mr. Brian Horowitz c/o Bam Brokerage, Inc. 26741 Portola Parkway No. 525 Foothill Ranch, California 92610 12  10 13 14 15 16 BY MAIL: I enclosed the document(s) in a sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed in the Service List and placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP's practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that the correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. 17 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of 18 America that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office of 19 a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. 20 Executed on June 3, 2014, at Los Angeles, California. 21 22 Jennifer L. Turgeon 23 24 25 26 27 28 899966.1 18 Case No. SACV 11-1234-JVS (JPRx) AMENDED [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?