Cesar Davila v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al

Filing 31

JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, (See document for details.) WHEREFORE, it is so ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the action be dismissed and that defendants recover their costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SARAH L. OVERTON (CSB # 163810) CUMMINGS, MCCLOREY, DAVIS, ACHO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 3801 University Avenue, Suite 560 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 276-4420 (951) 276-4405 facsimile soverton@cmda-law.com Attorneys for Defendants the Honorable Alan H. Friedenthal, Commissioner of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Bonnie Bogenberger, Maria Salmeron and Steven Ryan 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 JS-6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ) ) CASE NO. SACV11-01549 JVS(RNBx) ) CESAR DAVILA, ) ) ) JUDGMENT Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL ) ) TRUST COMPANY, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) The motions to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint of defendants the Honorable Alan H. Friedenthal, Commissioner of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Bonnie Bogenberger, Maria Salmeron, Steven Ryan, Leroy D. Baca, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, Eric G. Fernandez and Sean H. Bedrosian came regularly for hearing on August 6, 2012 before the Honorable James V. Selna. 27 28 Cummings, McClorey, Davis, Acho & Associates, P.C. 3801 University Avenue, Suite560 Riverside, CA 92501 Telephone (951) 276-4420 Facsimile (951) 276-4405 -1____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT 1 After considering the papers in favor of, and in opposition to, the motions to 2 dismiss, and after arguments were heard and considered, the motions to dismiss the 3 plaintiff’s first amended complaint as to defendants Honorable Alan H. Friedenthal, 4 Commissioner of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Bonnie 5 Bogenberger, Maria Salmeron, Steven Ryan, Leroy D. Baca, Sheriff of Los Angeles 6 County, Eric G. Fernandez and Sean H. Bedrosian were granted and the complaint 7 dismissed with prejudice as to these defendants. 8 9 WHEREFORE, it is so ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the action be dismissed and that defendants recover their costs of suit. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED: 12 13 14 Dated: ______________________________ United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Cummings, McClorey, Davis, Acho & Associates, P.C. 3801 University Avenue, Suite560 Riverside, CA 92501 Telephone (951) 276-4420 Facsimile (951) 276-4405 -2____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT 1 2 PROOF OF SERVICE Davila v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, et al CASE NO: SACV11-01549 JVS (RNBx) 3 4 5 6 7 I, the undersigned, declare as follows: I am employed in the County of Riverside, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years, and not a party to the within action. I am an employee of or agent for Cummings, McClorey, Davis, Acho & Associates, P.C., 3801 University Avenue, Suite 560, Riverside, California 92501. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 On August 13, 2012, I served the foregoing document(s): [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT on the following party(ies) in this action addressed as follows: CESAR DAVILA 15940 LAHEY STREET GRANADA HILLS, CA 91344 [XX] (BY MAIL) I caused a true copy of each document, placed in a sealed envelope with postage fully paid, to be placed in the United States mail at Riverside, California. I am “readily familiar” with this firm’s business practice for collection and processing of mail, that in the ordinary course of business said document(s) would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day. I understand that the service shall be presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or postage meter date on the envelope is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing contained in this affidavit. 19 20 [] (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I delivered each such document by hand to each addressee above. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [] (BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I caused a true copy of each document, placed in a sealed envelope with delivery fees provided for, to be deposited in a box regularly maintained by United Parcel Service®(UPS). I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice for collection and processing of documents for overnight delivery and know that in the ordinary course of business practice the document(s) described above will be deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained by UPS or delivered to a courier or driver authorized by UPS to receive documents on the same date it is placed for collection. 28 Cummings, McClorey, Davis, Acho & Associates, P.C. 3801 University Avenue, Suite560 Riverside, CA 92501 Telephone (951) 276-4420 Facsimile (951) 276-4405 -3____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [] (BY FACSIMILE) By use of facsimile machine number (951) 276-4405, I served a copy of the within document(s) on the above interested parties at the facsimile numbers listed above. The transmission was reported as complete and without error. The transmission report was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine. Executed on August 13, 2012, in Riverside, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. /S/ Marsha Bradley 8 9 Marsha Bradley 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Cummings, McClorey, Davis, Acho & Associates, P.C. 3801 University Avenue, Suite560 Riverside, CA 92501 Telephone (951) 276-4420 Facsimile (951) 276-4405 -4____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?