Niveen Ismail v. County of Orange et al
Filing
125
AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: (1) That Judgment be entered in favor of all Defendants City of Newport Beach, Orange County, Penny Freeman, Neil Schuster and Elizabeth Costello as against Plai ntiff Niveen Ismail; (2) That the entire action be dismissed; and (3) That Plaintiff Niveen Ismail take nothing and that Defendants City of Newport Beach, Orange County, Penny Freeman, Neil Schuster, and Elizabeth Costello recover their costs of suit in accordance with the Local Rules and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54. (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
NIVEEN ISMAIL,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PENNY FREEMAN; NEIL
)
SCHUSTER; each in their official
)
and individual capacities,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________ )
No. CV11-01751 CAS (AJW)
AMENDED ____________
[PROPOSED]
JUDGMENT
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff filed this case in this Court on November 14, 2011, asserting
claims for malicious prosecution and wrongful arrest pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983
and related state laws. Following a combination of joint stipulations and voluntary
dismissals, plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) on August 8,
2012, naming as defendants the City of Newport Beach (“Newport Beach”), the
County of Orange (“Orange County”), Detective Penny Freeman of the Newport
Beach Police Department (“Freeman”), Neil Schuster of the Newport Beach Police
Department (“Schuster”), and Deputy Orange County District Attorney Elizabeth
Costello.
1
Proposed Judgment
1
By order dated October 18, 2012, the Court dismissed all federal claims
2
against Elizabeth Costello and declined to exercise jurisdiction over the related
3
state law claims. Dkt. #79 at 6-11. The Court also dismissed all federal claims
4
against Orange County.
5
6
7
By order dated October 30, 2012, the Court dismissed all federal claims
against the City of Newport Beach. Dkt. #80.
Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), which alleges claims
8
against Freeman and Schuster for wrongful arrest and excessive bail. By order
9
dated July 29, 2013, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Freeman and
10
Schuster on all claims except plaintiff’s misdemeanor arrest claims against
11
Freeman. Freeman filed a motion for reconsideration on August 12, 2013, and
12
plaintiff filed an opposition on August 14, 2013. After reconsideration, on
13
September 13, 2013, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Freeman on
14
all remaining claims.
15
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
16
1.
That Judgment be entered in favor of all Defendants City of Newport
17
Beach, Orange County, Penny Freeman, Neil Schuster and Elizabeth Costello as
18
against Plaintiff Niveen Ismail;
19
2.
That the entire action be dismissed; and
20
3.
That Plaintiff Niveen Ismail take nothing and that Defendants
21
City of Newport Beach, Orange County, Penny Freeman, Neil Schuster, and
22
Elizabeth Costello recover their costs of suit in accordance with the Local Rules
23
and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54.
24
25
26
DATED
September 30, 2013
Honorable Christina A. Snyder
United States District Court Judge
27
28
2
Proposed Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?