Impac Mortgage Holdings Inc et al v. Houston Casualty Company et al

Filing 213

JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. (twdb)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS,
Case No.: 8:11-CV-01845 JLS (JCGx)
11 INC., IMPAC FUNDING
CORPORATION, IMPAC SECURED [Judge Josephine L. Staton]
12 ASSETS CORP., IMH ASSETS CORP.,
RICHARD J. JOHNSON, and JOSEPH
13 R. TOMKINSON,
JUDGMENT
14
15

Plaintiffs,
v.

16 HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY
and THOSE CERTAIN
17 UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S,
LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO
18 CERTIFICATE NOS. SUA12325 AND
SUA12084,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22

The Court, having previously issued an Order concerning Plaintiffs’ Motion

23 for Partial Summary Judgment and defendant Houston Casualty Company’s Motion
24 for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 162), and having considered the Stipulation Re
25 Dismissal Of Certain Of The Claims Alleged In Plaintiffs’ Supplemental First
26 Amended Complaint, which Order and Stipulation are expressly incorporated by
27 reference herein and made a part of this Judgment, now enters Final Judgment
28 concerning the causes of action asserted in Plaintiffs’ Supplemental First Amended
-1JUDGMENT

1 Complaint (Dkt. 183).
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

3

1.

With respect to the First Cause of Action in the Supplemental First

4 Amended Complaint:
a.

5

Plaintiffs’ claims as to Defendant Those Certain Underwriters at

6 Lloyd’s, London Subscribing To Certificate No. SUA12325 are dismissed with
7 prejudice.
b.

8

Plaintiffs’ claims as to Defendant Houston Casualty Company are

9 dismissed without prejudice.
10

2.

With respect to the Second Cause of Action in the Supplemental First

11 Amended Complaint:
a.

12

Plaintiffs’ claims as to Defendant Those Certain Underwriters at

13 Lloyd’s, London Subscribing To Certificate No. SUA12325 are dismissed with
14 prejudice.
b.

15

Judgment is entered in favor of Houston Casualty Company as to

16 the claims asserted against Defendant Houston Casualty Company.
17

3.

With respect to the Third Cause of Action in the Supplemental First

18 Amended Complaint:
a.

19

Plaintiffs’ claims as to Defendant Those Certain Underwriters at

20 Lloyd’s, London Subscribing To Certificate Nos. SUA12325 and SUA12084 are
21 dismissed with prejudice.
b.

22

Judgment is entered in favor of Houston Casualty Company as to

23 the claims asserted against Houston Casualty Company.
24

4.

With respect to the Fourth Cause of Action in the Supplemental First

25 Amended Complaint, Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Houston Casualty
26 Company and against all Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs shall take nothing under this Cause
27 of Action.
28

5.

With respect to the Fifth Cause of Action in the Supplemental First
-2JUDGMENT

1 Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs’ claims against Those Certain Underwriters at
2 Lloyd’s London Subscribing to Certificate Nos. SUA12325 and SUA12084 are
3 dismissed with prejudice.
4

6.

Defendant Houston Casualty Company shall recover its costs of suit

5 against Plaintiffs.
6
7
8 Dated: December 18, 2013
9

Hon. Josephine L. Staton
United States District Court Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LLSU/1076326/16497179v.1

-3JUDGMENT