Impac Mortgage Holdings Inc et al v. Houston Casualty Company et al

Filing 79

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Having reviewed the Stipulated and Proposed Protective Order filed herewith, and good cause appearing for the adoption thereof, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the terms of the revised Stipulated Protective Order are adopted by this Court in their entirety. re Stipulation for Protective Order 74 (lmh)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Duke F. Wahlquist (State Bar No. 117722) dwahlquist@rutan.com RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931 Telephone: 714-641-5100 Facsimile: 714-546-9035 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc., Impac Funding Corporation, Impac Secured Assets Corp., IMH Assets Corp., Richard J. Johnson, and Joseph R. Tomkinson Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Pages 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC., IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION, IMPAC SECURED ASSETS CORP., IMH ASSETS CORP., RICHARD J. JOHNSON, and JOSEPH R. TOMKINSON, 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiffs, v. HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY and THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE NOS. SUA12325 AND SUA12084, Case No.: 8:11-CV-01845 JST (JCGx) [Judge Josephine Staton Tucker] ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER PRE-TRIAL CONF.: 4/1/2013 TRIAL DATE: 4/16/2013 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER 20042823V1 1 2 3 4 Having reviewed the Stipulated and Proposed Protective Order filed herewith, and good cause appearing for the adoption thereof, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the terms of the revised Stipulated Protective Order are adopted by this Court in their entirety. 5 6 7 Dated: July 26, 2012 8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED ORDER] RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER 20042823V1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?