Impac Mortgage Holdings Inc et al v. Houston Casualty Company et al
Filing
79
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Having reviewed the Stipulated and Proposed Protective Order filed herewith, and good cause appearing for the adoption thereof, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the terms of the revised Stipulated Protective Order are adopted by this Court in their entirety. re Stipulation for Protective Order 74 (lmh)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Duke F. Wahlquist (State Bar No. 117722)
dwahlquist@rutan.com
RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
611 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1400
Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931
Telephone: 714-641-5100
Facsimile: 714-546-9035
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Impac Mortgage Holdings, Inc.,
Impac Funding Corporation, Impac
Secured Assets Corp., IMH Assets Corp.,
Richard J. Johnson, and Joseph R.
Tomkinson
Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Pages
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
IMPAC MORTGAGE HOLDINGS,
INC., IMPAC FUNDING
CORPORATION, IMPAC SECURED
ASSETS CORP., IMH ASSETS CORP.,
RICHARD J. JOHNSON, and JOSEPH
R. TOMKINSON,
17
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiffs,
v.
HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY
and THOSE CERTAIN
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S,
LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO
CERTIFICATE NOS. SUA12325 AND
SUA12084,
Case No.: 8:11-CV-01845 JST
(JCGx)
[Judge Josephine Staton Tucker]
ORDER ADOPTING
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER
PRE-TRIAL CONF.: 4/1/2013
TRIAL DATE:
4/16/2013
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER
20042823V1
1
2
3
4
Having reviewed the Stipulated and Proposed Protective Order filed
herewith, and good cause appearing for the adoption thereof,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the terms of the revised Stipulated
Protective Order are adopted by this Court in their entirety.
5
6
7
Dated: July 26, 2012
8
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED ORDER] RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER
20042823V1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?