John Bolda et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc et al

Filing 20

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rla)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN BOLDA, ET AL., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., 15 16 17 18 Defendant. ) CASE NO. SACV 11-1857-JST (MLGx) ) ) ) ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH ) PREJUDICE ) ) ) ) ) ) On June 20, 2012, the Court issued an order dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint 19 without prejudice as to Defendants MERS, Countrywide, Recontrust, and Bank of 20 America, and ordering Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint no later than July 11, 2012, 21 or the Complaint would be dismissed with prejudice as to those Defendants. (Doc. 19). 22 The Court also ordered Plaintiffs to show cause by July 11, 2012, why this case should 23 not be dismissed as to Defendant Fannie Mae, and advised that failure to respond would 24 result in the Court dismissing this case with prejudice as to Fannie Mae. To date, neither 25 an amended complaint nor a response to the Court’s order to show cause has been filed. 26 27 28 1 1 2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. 3 4 DATED: July 23, 2012 5 6 7 JOSEPHINE STATON TUCKER United State District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?