Kathleen Crapanzano v. Law Office of Curtis O Barnes PC et al
Filing
14
JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, in favor of Kathleen Crapanzano against Law Office of Curtis O Barnes PC Related to: Stipulation for Attorney Fees 13 . See judgment for more information. (twdb)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
) NO: 8:11-cv-01868-CJC (RNBx)
)
Plaintiff,
)
) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
v.
THE LAW OFFICE OF CURTIS O. )
BARNES, PC, and DOES 1 through )
)
10 inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
KATHLEEN CRAPANZANO,
Based on the Plaintiff’s Acceptance of the Offer of Judgment made by the
Defendant Law of Curtis O. Barnes, PC, which was granted by the court on
March 16, 2012, and the filed stipulation and agreement, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the following amounts be
entered as the judgment for Kathleen Crapanzano and against the Law Office of
Curtis O. Barnes, PC:
1. A judgment in the amount of $1,500.00 is entered in favor of Kathleen
Crapanzano and against the Law Office of Curtis O. Barnes, PC.
2. A judgment is entered for reasonable attorney fees in the amount of
$7,500.00 for Kathleen Crapanzano’s attorney Amir J. Goldstein, Esq. and
against the Law Office of Curtis O. Barnes, PC based on an agreed reasonable
1
8:11-cv-01868-CJC
JUDGMENT
1
2
rate of $300.00 an hour by the parties.
3. A Judgment shall be entered for costs in the amount of $411.00 for the
3
Plaintiff Kathleen Crapanzano and against the Defendant Law Office of Curtis
4
O. Barnes.
5
6
7
4. Accordingly, the total judgment amount shall be entered in this case as
follows: $9,411.00.
IT IS ORDERED
8
9
Dated: 4/2/12
10
_________________________________
United States District Court Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
8:11-cv-01868-CJC
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?