Kathleen Crapanzano v. Law Office of Curtis O Barnes PC et al

Filing 14

JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, in favor of Kathleen Crapanzano against Law Office of Curtis O Barnes PC Related to: Stipulation for Attorney Fees 13 . See judgment for more information. (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) NO: 8:11-cv-01868-CJC (RNBx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT v. THE LAW OFFICE OF CURTIS O. ) BARNES, PC, and DOES 1 through ) ) 10 inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) KATHLEEN CRAPANZANO, Based on the Plaintiff’s Acceptance of the Offer of Judgment made by the Defendant Law of Curtis O. Barnes, PC, which was granted by the court on March 16, 2012, and the filed stipulation and agreement, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the following amounts be entered as the judgment for Kathleen Crapanzano and against the Law Office of Curtis O. Barnes, PC: 1. A judgment in the amount of $1,500.00 is entered in favor of Kathleen Crapanzano and against the Law Office of Curtis O. Barnes, PC. 2. A judgment is entered for reasonable attorney fees in the amount of $7,500.00 for Kathleen Crapanzano’s attorney Amir J. Goldstein, Esq. and against the Law Office of Curtis O. Barnes, PC based on an agreed reasonable 1 8:11-cv-01868-CJC JUDGMENT 1 2 rate of $300.00 an hour by the parties. 3. A Judgment shall be entered for costs in the amount of $411.00 for the 3 Plaintiff Kathleen Crapanzano and against the Defendant Law Office of Curtis 4 O. Barnes. 5 6 7 4. Accordingly, the total judgment amount shall be entered in this case as follows: $9,411.00. IT IS ORDERED 8 9 Dated: 4/2/12 10 _________________________________ United States District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 8:11-cv-01868-CJC JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?