Scott Montoya v. Sandra Hutchens et al

Filing 18

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block re Stipulation for Protective Order 17 . (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT MONTOYA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. SACV11-01922 JVS (RNBx) District Judge, James V. Selna Courtroom 10/C [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER [FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER] Complaint Filed: 12/13/2011 FAC Filed: 1/13/2012 Trial Date: Unassigned. 20 21 22 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: The Court, having reviewed the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order, and 23 24 good cause being shown therefore, now ORDERS as follows: 25 The Stipulated Protective Order filed concurrently with the instant Order, and 26 entered into between Plaintiff Scott Montoya (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Orange 27 // 28 // 1 191772 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. SACV11-01922 JVS (RNBx) 1 County Sheriff’s Department (“OCSD”), (collectively referred to as “the Parties”), 2 by and through their attorneys of record, is hereby approved by this Court. The 3 Stipulated Protective Order shall be given full force and effect. 4 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 6 7 8 DATED: April 11, 2012 ____________________________ HON. ROBERT N. BLOCK United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 191772 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. SACV11-01922 JVS (RNBx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?