Scott Montoya v. Sandra Hutchens et al
Filing
32
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block re Stipulation for Protective Order 31 . (twdb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SCOTT MONTOYA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14
ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. SACV11-01922 JVS (RNBx)
District Judge, James V. Selna
Courtroom 10/C
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE
ORDER
[FILED CONCURRENTLY WITH
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER]
Complaint Filed: 12/13/2011
FAC Filed:
1/13/2012
Trial Date:
1/22/2013
20
21
22
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
The Court, having reviewed the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order, and
23
24
good cause being shown therefore, now ORDERS as follows:
25
The Stipulated Protective Order filed concurrently with the instant Order, and
26
entered into between Plaintiff Scott Montoya (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Orange
27
//
28
//
1
004/490/206817.1
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. SACV11-01922 JVS (RNBX)
1
County Sheriff’s Department (“OCSD”), (collectively referred to as “the Parties”),
2
by and through their attorneys of record, is hereby approved by this Court. The
3
Stipulated Protective Order shall be given full force and effect.
4
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
6
7
8
DATED: October 29, 2012
____________________________
HON. ROBERT N. BLOCK
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
004/490/206817.1
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. SACV11-01922 JVS (RNBX)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?