Pamela D Lawson et al v. American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc et al

Filing 27

JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. That plaintiffs Pamela D. Lawson and Michael T. Meehan take nothing by way of their complaint; and 2. That the action be, and it hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to All Defendants. (rla)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

U.S. DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

PAMELA D. LAWSON and MICHAEL
T. MEEHAN,
Plaintiffs,

JUDGMENT

14

v.

15

AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE
SERVICING INC., FIDELITY
NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY,
POWER DEFAULT SERVICES, INC.,
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. AS
TRUSTEE FOR OPTION ONE
MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-3,
ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES,
SERIES 2007-3, WELLS FARGO
BANK N.A., OPTION ONE
MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
LENDER PROCESSING SERVICES,
INC., DOCX L.L.LC, And All Persons
Unknown, Claiming Any Legal or
Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien, or
Interest in the Property Described in the
Complaint Adverse to Plaintiff's Title, or
Any Cloud On Plaintiff's Title Thereto
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

CASE NO.: SACV12-00247 DOC
(ANX)

Judge: Honorable David O. Carter
Complaint Filed: January 31, 2012
Trial Date:

Defendants.

26
27

On March 27, 2012, this Court granted both defendants’ American Home

28

Mortgage Servicing, Inc.; Power Default Services, Inc.; Wells Fargo Bank N.A., as
229753_2

-1JUDGMENT

1

Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 207-3, Asset Backed Certificates,

2

Series 2007-3, and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.’s (“Requesting Defendants”) Motion to

3

Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Dkt. No. 17) as well as defendants’ Docx LLLC and

4

Lender Processing Services Inc.’s (with Requesting Defendants “Defendants”)

5

Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Dkt. No. 15) with leave to amend and, in

6

the event no amended complaint was timely filed, the action would be dismissed with

7

prejudice.

8

Plaintiffs failed to timely file an amended complaint. On April 24, 2012 this

9

Court denied Plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief from Dismissal (Dkt. 23) based upon

10

Plaintiffs’ failure to demonstrate excusable neglect and granted Requesting

11

Defendants’ Request for Entry of Dismissal of Action with Prejudice Pursuant to

12

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (Dkt. 21).

13

Accordingly,

14

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

15

1. That plaintiffs Pamela D. Lawson and Michael T. Meehan take nothing

16

by way of their complaint; and

17

2. That the action be, and it hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to All

18

Defendants.

19
20

Dated: May2, 2012
David O. Carter
United States District Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
229753_2

-2JUDGMENT