Hung Van Dao v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 10

JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, NOW, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that all claims in the Complaint of Plaintiff Hung Van Dao are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and ReconTrust Company, N.A. (rla)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

Bryan Cave LLP
3161 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE 1500
Irvine, California 92612-4414

11
12 HUNG VAN DAO
13

Plaintiff,

14
15

Case No. 8:12-cv-00418-CJC(JPRx)
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF
DISMISSAL

v.

16 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. formally

doing business as NBGI INC;
17 RECONTRUST COMPANY; and DOES
1 through 50, inclusive

Hon. Cormac J. Carney
Courtroom 9B

18

Defendants

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IR01DOCS550809.1

[PROPSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

WHEREAS, on April 26, 2012, the Court granted a Motion to Dismiss

1

2 Plaintiff Hung Van Dao’s Complaint, with prejudice, as to Defendants Bank of
3 America, N.A (erroneously sued as “Bank of America formally doing business as
4 NBGI Inc.”) and ReconTrust Company, N.A. (erroneously sued as “ReconTrust
5 Company”). See Court Docket No. 8.

NOW, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that

6

7 all claims in the Complaint of Plaintiff Hung Van Dao are DISMISSED WITH
8 PREJUDICE as to Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and ReconTrust Company,
9 N.A.
10

SUCH JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED.

Bryan Cave LLP
3161 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE 1500
Irvine, California 92612-4414

11
12 Dated: 5/3/12
13
14

________________________________
Hon. Cormac J. Carney
United States District Court Judge
Central District of California

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IR01DOCS550809.1

1
[PROPSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL