Amanda M Alcala v. Michael J Astrue
Filing
18
ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich. Fees awarded to plaintiff in the amount of $ $5,000 and costs of $350.00. Re: Stipulation for Attorney Fees 17 (yb)
1
2
3
4
5
Shanny J. Lee, Calif. Bar No. 213599
LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER
AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C.
770 The City Drive South Suite 2000
Orange, CA 92868
Phone (714) 564-8644
Fax (714) 940-0311
Email: shannyjlee@gmail.com
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff Amanda M. Alcala
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SOUTHERN DIVISION
13
AMANDA M. ALCALA,
14
15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
18
CAROLYN W. COLVIN1,
Commissioner of Social Security,
19
Defendant.
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. SACV 12-00626 AJW
ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY
FEES UNDER THE EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT,
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d),
AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28
U.S.C. § 1920
21
22
23
24
1
25
26
27
Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013.
Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be
substituted for Michael J. Astrue as the defendant in this suit. No further action need to be taken
to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
28
1
1
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal
2
Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall
3
be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FIVE THOUSND
4
dollars and 00/100’s ($5,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount
5
of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00/CENTS ($350.00), subject to
6
the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to
7
Plaintiff’s counsel.
8
9
July 16, 2013
10
11
12
13
HON. ANDREW J. WISTRICH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?