Carleen Temple v. Homewide Lending Corp et al
Filing
5
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURTS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Plaintiff has failed to comply with this order 4 and file an opposition. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (mu)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JS-6
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No. SACV 12-00643-CJC(RNBx)
Date: May 11, 2012
Title: CARLEEN TEMPLE v. HOMEWIDE LENDING CORP., ET AL.
PRESENT:
HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Michelle Urie
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF:
None Present
N/A
Court Reporter
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff filed this action against Defendants asserting ten causes of action
relating to the non-judicial foreclosure process initiated on her property. On April 30,
2012 the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not
be dismissed for failure to state a claim, because, in reviewing the complaint, it appeared
to the Court that Plaintiff’s claims did not state cognizable causes of action, were
inadequately pled, and/or were based on theories of liability that were not viable.
Plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition to the Court’s order by May 8, 2012. Plaintiff
has failed to comply with this order and file an opposition. Accordingly, the Court
DISMISSES Plaintiff’s action.
jsk
MINUTES FORM 11
CIVIL-GEN
Initials of Deputy Clerk MU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?