Hung Trinh v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al
Filing
16
ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: Granting Stipulation Joint Dismissing Action with Prejudice 15 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mt)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Rex P. Sofonio, SBN 190671
Maribel B. Ullrich, SBN 246970
SOFONIO & ASSOCIATES, APLC
2030 Main Street, Suite 1300
Irvine, California 92614
Telephone: (949) 260-9191 / Facsimile: (949) 260-9192
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HUNG TRINH
JS-6
FERMIN H. LLAGUNO, SBN 185222
MINDY H. BALDWIN, SBN 228398
MUSTAFA S. EL-FARRA, SBN 247206
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
2050 Main Street, Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 705-3000 / Facsimile: (949) 724-1201
Attorneys for Defendant
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
HUNG TRINH, an individual,
Case No.: SACV12-798 JVS (JPRx)
ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO
JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA, COURTROOM
10C
17
18
Plaintiff,
19
20
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE
vs.
21
22
23
24
25
[Fed. R. Civ. P 41(a)]
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED, a
business entity form unknown, and DOES 1 to
100, inclusive,
Trial Date: 10/22/13
Defendants.
26
27
28
Upon consideration of the Parties’ Joint Stipulation Dismissing Action with Prejudice, and good
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
cause appearing,
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
3
1. Plaintiff’s Complaint and this entire action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to
4
5
6
7
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)
2. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with the
prosecution and defense of this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
11
12
Dated: November 21, 2012
______________________________
JAMES V. SELNA
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?