Hung Trinh v. Quest Diagnostics Incorporated et al

Filing 16

ORDER by Judge James V. Selna: Granting Stipulation Joint Dismissing Action with Prejudice 15 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mt)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Rex P. Sofonio, SBN 190671 Maribel B. Ullrich, SBN 246970 SOFONIO & ASSOCIATES, APLC 2030 Main Street, Suite 1300 Irvine, California 92614 Telephone: (949) 260-9191 / Facsimile: (949) 260-9192 Attorneys for Plaintiff HUNG TRINH JS-6 FERMIN H. LLAGUNO, SBN 185222 MINDY H. BALDWIN, SBN 228398 MUSTAFA S. EL-FARRA, SBN 247206 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 2050 Main Street, Suite 900 Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: (949) 705-3000 / Facsimile: (949) 724-1201 Attorneys for Defendant QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 HUNG TRINH, an individual, Case No.: SACV12-798 JVS (JPRx) ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA, COURTROOM 10C 17 18 Plaintiff, 19 20 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE vs. 21 22 23 24 25 [Fed. R. Civ. P 41(a)] QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED, a business entity form unknown, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Trial Date: 10/22/13 Defendants. 26 27 28 Upon consideration of the Parties’ Joint Stipulation Dismissing Action with Prejudice, and good -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 cause appearing, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 3 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint and this entire action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 4 5 6 7 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) 2. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with the prosecution and defense of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 11 12 Dated: November 21, 2012 ______________________________ JAMES V. SELNA U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?