Interpols Network Incorporated v. Aura Interactive Inc et al

Filing 140

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 139 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Joseph R. Re (State Bar No. 134,479)
[e-mail]
Marko R. Zoretic (State Bar No. 233,952)
[e-mail]
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
2040 Main Street
Fourteenth Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JS-6

Attorneys for Aura Interactive, Inc.
(d/b/a The Aura Group)
Jon E. Maki (State Bar No. 199,958)
[e-mail]
LAW OFFICE OF JON E. MAKI
4135 Calle Isabelino
San Diego, California 92130
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Interpols Network Incorporated

13
14
15
16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SOUTHERN DIVISION

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

) SACV 12-00832 JVS(JPRX)
)
)
) STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT
)
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, )
) Hon. James V. Selna
v.
)
)
AURA INTERACTIVE, INC, a
)
California corporation, and THE )
AURA GROUP,
)
)
)
Defendant/Counterclaimant )
)
INTERPOLS NETWORK
INCORPORATED, a California
corporation,

1

On January 6, 2014, this Court granted The Motion for Partial Summary

2

Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by Defendant Aura Interactive, Inc., d/b/a

3

The Aura Group, (“Aura”) because Aura does not did not infringe as a matter of

4

law U.S. Patent Nos. 7,673,017 and 8,204,961, asserted by Interpols Network

5

Inc. (“Interpols”).

6

Thereafter, Interpols and Aura entered into a stipulation under which

7

Interpols agreed to dismiss with prejudice its state-law claim alleging unfair

8

business practices under California Business and Professions Code § 17200 et

9

seq. and Aura agreed to dismiss its counterclaims seeking declaratory judgments

10

of invalidity of the ’017 patent and the ’961 patents without prejudice. In

11

accordance with the above-described order and stipulation,

12

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

13

(1)

Judgment is entered in favor of Aura and against Interpols as to the

14

claims of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,673,017 and 8,204,961 set forth in

15

Interpols’s First Amended Complaint and as to Aura’s counterclaims seeking

16

declarations of non-infringement of those patents as set forth in the Answer of

17

Aura;

18

(2)

Interpols’s claims against Aura alleging unfair business practices

19

under California Business and Professions Code § 17200 et seq. are dismissed,

20

with prejudice;

21

(3)

Aura’s counterclaims against Interpols seeking declaratory

22

judgments of invalidity of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,673,017 and 8,204,961 are

23

dismissed, without prejudice; and

24

(4)

Interpols takes nothing by way of its claims asserted against Aura.

25

(5)

Aura, as prevailing party, is entitled to recover its costs pursuant to

26

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), in an amount to be determined and

27

subject to documentation and verification. Interpols reserves the right to object

28

to Aura’s bill of costs.
1

1

Because no claims are remaining in this action, the Court expressly

2

directs the Clerk to enter this Final Judgment as set forth above pursuant to

3

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: February 28, 2014
James V. Selna
United States District Judge

8
9
10

17000672

11

010914

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2