Kevin Lee Francois v. Officer Troy Zeeman et al

Filing 313

JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICT by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that final judgment in this action be entered as follows: 1. Judgment on all claims is entered in favor of Defendants Troy Zeeman and Marie Gamble and agains t Plaintiff Kevin Lee Francois; 2. Plaintiff Kevin Lee Francois shall take nothing by his Complaint; 3. Defendants shall recover costs of suit in favor of Defendants Troy Zeeman and Marie Gamble and against Plaintiff Kevin Lee Francois. RE: Jury Verdict, 310 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (aco)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

KEVIN LEE FRANCOIS,

13

Hon. George H. Wu

Plaintiff,

14
15

No: SACV 12-988-GW-PJWx
JUDGMENT ON JURY
VERDICT

v.

16
17
18

OFFICER TROY ZEEMAN, et al.,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICT
1

1

This action came on regularly for jury trial on June 1, 2022 in Courtroom 9D

2 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Plaintiff
3 Kevin Lee Francois was self represented. Defendants Troy Zeeman and Marie
4 Gamble were represented by Allen Christiansen, Esq. of Ferguson, Praet &
5 Sherman, APC.
6

A jury of eight persons was regularly empaneled and sworn. Witnesses were

7 sworn and testified. After hearing the evidence and arguments of plaintiff and
8 counsel the jury was duly instructed by the Court and the case was submitted to the
9 jury. The jury deliberated and thereafter returned a verdict on June 3, 2022 as
10 follows:
11
12
13

QUESTION #1
Did Plaintiff prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Troy Zeeman

14 used unreasonable force against Kevin Lee Francois?
15
16

YES _____ NO __X__

17
18

If you answered NO as to Question 1, skip to Question 4, do not answer

19 Questions 2 or 3.
20
21
22

QUESTION #4
Did Plaintiff prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Marie Gamble

23 used unreasonable force against Kevin Lee Francois?
24
25

YES _____ NO __X__

26
27
28 ///
JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICT
2

1

Now, therefore, pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil

2 Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
3 final judgment in this action be entered as follows:
4
5
6

1. Judgment on all claims is entered in favor of Defendants Troy Zeeman and
Marie Gamble and against Plaintiff Kevin Lee Francois;

7

2. Plaintiff Kevin Lee Francois shall take nothing by his Complaint;

8

3. Defendants shall recover costs of suit in favor of Defendants Troy Zeeman

9

and Marie Gamble and against Plaintiff Kevin Lee Francois.

10
11
12 Dated: June 7, 2022

_______________________

13

Hon. George H. Wu

14

United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT ON JURY VERDICT
3