Amy Lynn Ewing-Perez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. et al
Filing
20
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Cormac J. Carney, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N. A. against Amy Lynn Ewing-Perez. As the prevailing party, defendant Wells Fargo may submit an application to tax costs and file a motion to recover its attorneys' fees. (rla)
1
2
3
4
5
6
A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SOUTHERN DIVISION
10
11 AMY LYNN EWING-PEREZ,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and
NBS DEFAULT SERVICES, and Does
15 1 to 100, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
CASE NO.: SACV12-1062CJC(MLGx)
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
[Assigned to Hon. Cormac J. Carney]
17
18
19
20 TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR
21 COUNSEL OF RECORD:
22
On September 7, 2012, the Court entered an Order granting the motion to
23 dismiss filed by defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor by merger
24 with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28
93000/FR0434/00480599-1
CASE NO. 8:12-CV-01062-CJC-MLG
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
1 World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”) and dismissing the action with
2 prejudice. The Court also denied Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction .
Accordingly:
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
5
1.
This action is dismissed with prejudice;
6
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is denied;
7
A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP
3
3.
Plaintiff Amy Lynn Ewing-Perez will take nothing from defendant
8
9
10
Wells Fargo, in this action; and
3.
As the prevailing party, defendant Wells Fargo may submit an
application to tax costs and file a motion to recover its attorneys’ fees.
11
12
13 Dated: September 13, 2012
14
HON. CORMAC J. CARNEY
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR0434/00480599-1
CASE NO. 8:12-CV-01062-CJC-MLG
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?