In re Questcor Securities Litigation

Filing 256

FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee. This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation of settlement dated 4/8/2015. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 In re QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 13 SECURITIES LITIGATION 14 15 16 This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- No. SA CV 12-01623-DMG(JPRx) CLASS ACTION FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 This matter came before the Court pursuant to the Order Preliminarily 2 Approving Settlement and Providing for Notice (“Order”) dated May 27, 2015, on the 3 application of the parties for approval of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation of 4 Settlement dated as of April 8, 2015 (the “Stipulation”). Due and adequate notice 5 having been given to the Class as required in said Order, and the Court having 6 considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and good cause appearing 7 therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 8 1. This Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the 9 Stipulation, and all terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the 10 Stipulation, unless otherwise set forth herein. 11 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Litigation and 12 over all parties to the Litigation, including all Members of the Class. 13 3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the Court hereby 14 approves the settlement set forth in the Stipulation and finds that: (a) 15 said Stipulation and the settlement contained therein, are, in all 16 respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate and in the best interest of the Class; 17 (b) there was no collusion in connection with the Stipulation; 18 (c) the Stipulation was the product of informed, arm’s-length 19 negotiations among competent, able counsel; and (d) 20 the record is sufficiently developed and complete to have enabled 21 Plaintiffs and Defendants to have adequately evaluated and considered their positions. 22 4. Accordingly, the Court authorizes and directs implementation and 23 performance of all the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, as well as the terms and 24 provisions hereof. Except as to any individual claim of those Persons (identified in 25 Exhibit 1 attached hereto) who have validly and timely requested exclusion from the 26 Class, the Court hereby dismisses the Litigation and all Released Claims of the Class 27 with prejudice. The Settling Parties are to bear their own costs, except as and to the 28 extent provided in the Stipulation and herein. -2- 1 5. Upon the Effective Date, and as provided in the Stipulation, Plaintiffs 2 shall, and each of the Class Members shall be deemed to have, and by operation of 3 this Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and 4 discharged any and all Released Claims (including Unknown Claims) against the 5 Released Persons, whether or not such Class Member executes and delivers the Proof 6 of Claim and Release form or shares in the Settlement Fund. Claims to enforce the 7 terms of the Stipulation are not released. 8 6. Plaintiffs and all Class Members are hereby forever barred and enjoined 9 from prosecuting any of the Released Claims against any of the Released Persons. 10 7. Upon the Effective Date, and as provided in the Stipulation, each of the 11 Released Persons shall be deemed to have, and by operation of this Judgment shall 12 have, fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged Plaintiffs, each 13 and all of the Class Members, and Plaintiffs’ counsel from all claims and causes of 14 action of every nature and description (including Unknown Claims), whether arising 15 under federal (including Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 11 and 37.1), state, common 16 or foreign law, that arise out of or relate to the institution, prosecution, or settlement of 17 the claims against Defendants, except for claims relating to the enforcement of the 18 settlement. 19 8. The Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action given to the Class 20 was the best notice practicable under the circumstances, including the individual 21 notice to all Members of the Class who could be identified through reasonable effort. 22 Said notice provided the best notice practicable under the circumstances of those 23 proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, including the settlement set forth in 24 the Stipulation, to all Persons entitled to such notice, and said notice fully satisfied the 25 requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and the requirements of due 26 process. 27 28 -3- 1 9. Any Plan of Allocation submitted by Lead Counsel or any order entered 2 regarding any attorneys’ fee and expense application shall in no way disturb or affect 3 this Judgment and shall be considered separate from this Judgment. 4 10. Neither the Stipulation nor the settlement contained therein, nor any act 5 performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the 6 settlement: (a) is or may be deemed to be or may be used as an admission of, or 7 evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim, or of any wrongdoing or liability of 8 Defendants or their respective Related Parties, or (b) is or may be deemed to be or 9 may be used as an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of the 10 Defendants or their respective Related Parties in any civil, criminal, or administrative 11 proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal. Defendants and/or 12 their respective Related Parties may file the Stipulation and/or this Judgment from this 13 action in any other action that may be brought against them in order to support a 14 defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, 15 release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction, or any theory of claim 16 preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim. 17 11. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court 18 hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of this settlement and 19 any award or distribution of the Settlement Fund, including interest earned thereon; 20 (b) disposition of the Settlement Fund; (c) hearing and determining applications for 21 attorneys’ fees, expenses, and interest in the Litigation; and (d) all parties herein for 22 the purpose of construing, enforcing, and administering the Stipulation. 23 12. The Court finds that during the course of the Litigation, the Settling 24 Parties and their respective counsel at all times complied with the requirements of 25 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. 26 13. In the event that the settlement does not become effective in accordance 27 with the terms of the Stipulation, or the Effective Date does not occur, or in the event 28 that the Settlement Fund, or any portion thereof, is returned to Defendants and/or their -4- 1 insurers, then this Judgment shall be rendered null and void to the extent provided by 2 and in accordance with the Stipulation and shall be vacated and, in such event, all 3 orders entered and releases delivered in connection herewith shall be null and void to 4 the extent provided by and in accordance with the Stipulation. 5 14. Without further order of the Court, the Settling Parties may agree to 6 reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Stipulation. 7 15. The Court directs immediate entry of this Judgment by the Clerk of the 8 Court. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 DATED: September 22, 2015 12 __________________________________ DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5- EXHIBIT 1 Exhibit 1 - 5 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?