Ana Molina v. Alliance Bancorp et al

Filing 7

ORDER RE DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL COURT RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 41(A) by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato, re First REQUEST 6 : The case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its/his/her own fees and costs incurred in connection there with. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rla)

Download PDF
JS-6 ----mE~OiJTHE"RN-o!\7:;:.c)i·:i __ _ CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COU/1T ~20~] 2 3 CENTRAL BY 4 UNITES STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 OF CALIFORNIA DEPUTY CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANA MOLINA, an individual Case No.: 8:12-cv-01848-AN 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 Io II I 2 vs. ALLIANCE BANCORP; U.S. BANK, N.A.; CENLAR, FSB; QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP; and DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive, [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL COURT RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 41(A) I3 Defendants. I4 I5 I6 I7 I8 I9 After reviewing Plaintiffs request, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing 20 its/his/her own fees and costs incurred in connection there with. 2I 22 23 24 25 26 Dated: November 5, 20 12 Hon. Judge Arthur Nakazato United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 rPRAPA~Pnl ()RnFR RF nT<:<M!<:<<:<A I. PIJR<:<I TA NT T() FFnFR AT rm !RT RT JT .F ()F rTVTT PR()rFnr IRF RT JT .F 41 (A

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?