Hemopet v. Hills Pet Nutrition Inc

Filing 125

JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. (mt)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

Case No.: SACV 12-01908-JLS (JPRx)

11
12

HEMOPET,
Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
Honorable Josephine L. Staton

15
16
17

JUDGMENT

HILL’S PET NUTRITION, INC.,
Defendant.

18
19

The Court, having considered Defendant Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc. Motion

20

for Summary Judgment (Doc. 93), the arguments and evidence presented in the

21

moving, opposition and reply papers and at oral argument, and a decision granting

22

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment having been duly rendered on

23

November 24, 2014 (Doc. 119), deciding that claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No.

24

7,865,343, claims 1, 2, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 8,060,354, claim 1 of U.S.

25

Patent 8,234,099, and claims 1 and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 8,224,587 are invalid

26

under 35 U.S.C. § 101:

27
28

1
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment is
entered in favor of Defendant Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc.

3
4
5
SO ORDERED:

6
7
8
9

Dated: January 15, 2015
____________________________
Honorable Josephine L. Staton
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2