Luis R. Pascual v. The Boeing Company et al
Filing
7
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court ORDERS plaintiffs counsel, to show cause in writing no later than May 17, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecuti on for failure to file a joint report (FRCivP 26). As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Filing of the parties joint report (FRCivP 26). (See document for further details.) (rla)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Date
Case No.
SACV 12-02081-CJC(MLGx)
Title
Luis R. Pacual v. The Boeing Company, et al
Present: The
Honorable
May 7, 2013
CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Michelle Urie
Not Reported
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None Present
None Present
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION
The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff’s counsel, to show cause in writing no
later than May 17, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution for failure to
file a joint report (FRCivP 26). As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will
consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before
the above date:
X
Filing of the parties joint report (FRCivP 26)
Absent a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and
complaint have not been served upon all defendants within 120 days after the filing of the
complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (m). The Court may dismiss the action prior to the expiration of
such time, however, if plaintiffs have not diligently prosecuted the action.
It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action
diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If
necessary, plaintiffs must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any
defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court.
Local Rule 8.3.
No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will
stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon
which a response by plaintiffs is due.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
0
mu
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?