Oakley Inc v. Nike Inc et al

Filing 189

JUDGMENT Granting Defendant Nike, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment and Judgment on the Pleadings by Judge James V. Selna, in favor of Nike Inc against Oakley Inc. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 OAKLEY, INC., 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP CASE NO. SACV12-02138 JVS (ANx) Plaintiff, v. NIKE, INC.; and RORY McILROY, Defendants. JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANT NIKE, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AGAINST PLAINTIFF OAKLEY, INC. PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 56 AND 12(C) Hearing: Date: Time: Place: Judge: December 16, 2013 1:30 p.m. Dept. 10-C Hon. James V. Selna After considering the papers submitted by Defendant Nike, Inc. (“Nike”): Defendant Nike’s Motion for Summary Judgment and for Judgment on the Pleadings was GRANTED. (Doc. 180) There were no triable issues of material fact as to the causes of action asserted in Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.’s (“Oakley”) First Amended Complaint against Nike. Oakley failed to demonstrate any facts supporting its cause of action for intentional interference with contractual relations. Oakley could not maintain its claim for relief for unfair competition under California Business and 1 Professions Code Section 17200. Oakley’s claim for declaratory relief failed as a 2 matter of law because the claim attempts to remedy past wrongdoing and is duplicative 3 of Oakley’s other two claims. 4 5 6 Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant Nike and against Plaintiff Oakley on all causes of action in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: December 30, 2013 10 Honorable James V. Selna United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Respectfully submitted by: JEFFREY T. THOMAS JEFFREY H. REEVES JOSEPH A. GORMAN SEAN S. TWOMEY GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP By: /s/ Jeffrey T. Thomas Jeffrey T. Thomas Attorneys for Defendant NIKE, INC. 19 20 JUDGMENT RE MSJ.DOCX 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?