Rebecca Morris Shubin v. Michael J Astrue

Filing 27

ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. Fees awarded to plaintiff in the amount of $ $2550 Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 26 . (mrgo)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Brian C. Shapiro Attorney at Law: 192789 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-8868 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Rebecca M. Shubin 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 REBECCA M. SHUBIN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: SACV 13-146 DTB {PROPOSED} ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 17 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: /// /// 1 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted, therefore, for Commissioner Michael J. Astrue as Defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). For simplicity, Plaintiff will refer to the Acting Commissioner as the Commissioner. -1- 1 2 IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $2550 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 3 4 5 6 DATE: January 9, 2014 ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE DAVID T. BRISTOW UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?