Meggitt San Juan Capistrano Inc v. Nie Yongzhong et al
Filing
724
CONSENT JUDGMENT, PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL re 723 Joint Stipulation filed by Judge David O. Carter. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (dgo)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
MEGGITT (ORANGE COUNTY),
INC. and MEGGITT (MARYLAND),
INC.,
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. SACV 13-0239 DOC (DFMx)
CONSENT JUDGMENT,
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND
DISMISSAL [723]
Hon. David O. Carter
NIE YONGZHONG and XIAMEN
NIELL ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.,
Defendants.
19
20
ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT, CONSENT JUDGMENT AND
21
PERMANENT INJUNCTION, AND DISMISSING ACTION IN ITS
22
ENTIRETY
23
Pursuant to and based upon the Settlement Agreement entered into by the
24
parties, and the “Stipulation for Consent Judgment, Permanent Injunction and
25
Dismissal” filed by Plaintiffs Meggitt (Orange County), Inc. and Meggitt
26
(Maryland), Inc. (collectively “Plaintiffs” or “Meggitt”) and Defendants Nie
27
Yongzhong and Xiamen Niell Electronics Co. Ltd. (collectively “Defendants”), it is
28
hereby ORDERED, ADJUDICATED, and DECREED that:
Consent Judgment,
Permanent Injunction and Dismissal
1
1.
This Court has continuing jurisdiction over the parties and the subject
2
matter hereof to enforce the terms and provisions of this Consent Judgment,
3
Permanent Injunction and of the Settlement Agreement.
4
2.
Defendants, and each of them, and each of their related directors,
5
entities, officers, employees, subsidiaries, and affiliates, are hereby permanently
6
enjoined and restrained, from directly or indirectly, and whether acting alone or in
7
concert with others, from:
8
a.
9
information, technology and/or property (including documents in
Retaining possession of any of Plaintiffs’ proprietary
10
physical or electronic format, and a hard drive) that contains
11
Plaintiffs’ proprietary information or technology, all of which shall be
12
returned to Plaintiffs or their counsel within thirty (30) days after
13
entry of this Order.
14
b.
15
People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) any of the following products, or
16
any product, regardless of model number, that is no more than
17
colorably different than one of these products: CAYD051,
18
CAYZ146V-1-500, CAYZ156V-1-2000, CAYD053-10, CAYD053-
19
50, CAYD051V, CAYD063V, CAYD149V-500, CAYD149V-500C,
20
CAYD051V-100B, and CAYD172-25 (“Restricted Products”), or any
21
Product that is determined to be a “Restricted Product” under Section
22
2.c.
23
c.
24
PRC any of the following products, or any product that is no more
25
than colorably different than one of these products: CAYZ123V-2-
26
2000, CAYD172-10 and CAYD172-50 (“Disputed Products”), unless
27
and until Meggitt has completed inspection of these products. A Niell-
28
Tech product will be considered to be a Restricted Product if that
Marketing outside of the current geographic boundaries of the
Marketing outside of the current geographic boundaries of the
1
Consent Judgment,
Permanent Injunction and Dismissal
1
product is found: i) to include or incorporate any Meggitt Proprietary
2
Information and Technology; ii) to have been designed or
3
manufactured using any Meggitt Proprietary Information and
4
Technology; or iii) to be not more than colorably different from a
5
Restricted Product.
6
d.
Marketing a Restricted Product under a different model number;
7
e.
Including in any advertising or marketing literature, or on any
8
website, any reference to a Meggitt company, equipment, products or
9
photographs of the same, including but not limited to any reference
10
that former employees of Meggitt or any Meggitt affiliate, Endevco or
11
Wilcoxon work with, at or for one of the Defendants; and will not
12
represent to any party that Defendants or either of them now has or
13
shall have at any time in the future a business relationship with Meggitt
14
or any of its affiliates;
15
f.
16
manufacture and available for purchase, or publishing performance
17
specifications for any product that is not currently in manufacture and
18
available for sale, and accurately reflects the correct performance
19
specifications for that product;
20
g.
21
Proprietary Information and Technology.
22
3.
Advertising for sale any product that is not currently in
Developing a new product using or incorporating Meggitt
The term “Marketing” means displaying, promoting, demonstrating,
23
selling, offering to sell, importing or exporting. For example, a sale by Defendants
24
or either of them of a product within the PRC for use, either as a stand-alone
25
product or in combination with another product, outside the PRC shall be deemed
26
Marketing. For the avoidance of doubt, “Marketing,” “Marketed,” or “Market”
27
does not include the operation of a website that describes, promotes, or otherwise
28
advertises Niell-Tech’s business and products, or otherwise indicates that Niell2
Consent Judgment,
Permanent Injunction and Dismissal
1
Tech’s Restricted Products or Disputed Products are available for purchase and use
2
within the PRC, provided Niell-Tech includes the information specified in the
3
Settlement Agreement. The definition of Meggitt Proprietary Information and
4
Technology is as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, and is incorporated by
5
reference herein.
6
4.
The restrictions on sale of Restricted Products set forth above in
7
Section 2.b, 2.c and 2.d expire on the 8th anniversary of the date this Order is
8
entered (that is, the date of entry plus eight (8) years).
9
5.
The parties have stipulated to the entry of this Consent Judgment. In
10
doing so, the parties have further stipulated that Defendants do not admit liability or
11
wrongdoing in any way, and Defendants state that they are agreeing to its entry to
12
avoid the expense of trial.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
17
Dated: July 31, 2015
_________________________________
Hon. David O. Carter
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Consent Judgment,
Permanent Injunction and Dismissal
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Presented by:
Robert W. Dickerson (State Bar No. 89,367)
rdickerson@manatt.com
Lawrence R. LaPorte (State Bar No. 130,003)
llaporte@manatt.com
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
11355 West Olympic Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064
Telephone: (310) 312-4000
Facsimile: (310) 312-4224
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
MEGGITT (ORANGE COUNTY), INC.
and MEGGITT (MARYLAND), INC.
Daniel Johnson, Jr. (State Bar No. 57,409)
djjohnson@morganlewis.com
Michael J. Lyons (State Bar No. 202,284)
mlyons@morganlewis.com
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2122
Telephone: (650) 843-4000
Facsimile: (650) 843-4001
Attorneys for Defendants
NIE YONGZHONG and XIAMEN NIELL
ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Consent Judgment,
Permanent Injunction and Dismissal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?