Meggitt San Juan Capistrano Inc v. Nie Yongzhong et al

Filing 724

CONSENT JUDGMENT, PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL re 723 Joint Stipulation filed by Judge David O. Carter. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (dgo)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 MEGGITT (ORANGE COUNTY), INC. and MEGGITT (MARYLAND), INC., 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, v. Case No. SACV 13-0239 DOC (DFMx) CONSENT JUDGMENT, PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND DISMISSAL [723] Hon. David O. Carter NIE YONGZHONG and XIAMEN NIELL ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., Defendants. 19 20 ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT, CONSENT JUDGMENT AND 21 PERMANENT INJUNCTION, AND DISMISSING ACTION IN ITS 22 ENTIRETY 23 Pursuant to and based upon the Settlement Agreement entered into by the 24 parties, and the “Stipulation for Consent Judgment, Permanent Injunction and 25 Dismissal” filed by Plaintiffs Meggitt (Orange County), Inc. and Meggitt 26 (Maryland), Inc. (collectively “Plaintiffs” or “Meggitt”) and Defendants Nie 27 Yongzhong and Xiamen Niell Electronics Co. Ltd. (collectively “Defendants”), it is 28 hereby ORDERED, ADJUDICATED, and DECREED that: Consent Judgment, Permanent Injunction and Dismissal 1 1. This Court has continuing jurisdiction over the parties and the subject 2 matter hereof to enforce the terms and provisions of this Consent Judgment, 3 Permanent Injunction and of the Settlement Agreement. 4 2. Defendants, and each of them, and each of their related directors, 5 entities, officers, employees, subsidiaries, and affiliates, are hereby permanently 6 enjoined and restrained, from directly or indirectly, and whether acting alone or in 7 concert with others, from: 8 a. 9 information, technology and/or property (including documents in Retaining possession of any of Plaintiffs’ proprietary 10 physical or electronic format, and a hard drive) that contains 11 Plaintiffs’ proprietary information or technology, all of which shall be 12 returned to Plaintiffs or their counsel within thirty (30) days after 13 entry of this Order. 14 b. 15 People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) any of the following products, or 16 any product, regardless of model number, that is no more than 17 colorably different than one of these products: CAYD051, 18 CAYZ146V-1-500, CAYZ156V-1-2000, CAYD053-10, CAYD053- 19 50, CAYD051V, CAYD063V, CAYD149V-500, CAYD149V-500C, 20 CAYD051V-100B, and CAYD172-25 (“Restricted Products”), or any 21 Product that is determined to be a “Restricted Product” under Section 22 2.c. 23 c. 24 PRC any of the following products, or any product that is no more 25 than colorably different than one of these products: CAYZ123V-2- 26 2000, CAYD172-10 and CAYD172-50 (“Disputed Products”), unless 27 and until Meggitt has completed inspection of these products. A Niell- 28 Tech product will be considered to be a Restricted Product if that Marketing outside of the current geographic boundaries of the Marketing outside of the current geographic boundaries of the 1 Consent Judgment, Permanent Injunction and Dismissal 1 product is found: i) to include or incorporate any Meggitt Proprietary 2 Information and Technology; ii) to have been designed or 3 manufactured using any Meggitt Proprietary Information and 4 Technology; or iii) to be not more than colorably different from a 5 Restricted Product. 6 d. Marketing a Restricted Product under a different model number; 7 e. Including in any advertising or marketing literature, or on any 8 website, any reference to a Meggitt company, equipment, products or 9 photographs of the same, including but not limited to any reference 10 that former employees of Meggitt or any Meggitt affiliate, Endevco or 11 Wilcoxon work with, at or for one of the Defendants; and will not 12 represent to any party that Defendants or either of them now has or 13 shall have at any time in the future a business relationship with Meggitt 14 or any of its affiliates; 15 f. 16 manufacture and available for purchase, or publishing performance 17 specifications for any product that is not currently in manufacture and 18 available for sale, and accurately reflects the correct performance 19 specifications for that product; 20 g. 21 Proprietary Information and Technology. 22 3. Advertising for sale any product that is not currently in Developing a new product using or incorporating Meggitt The term “Marketing” means displaying, promoting, demonstrating, 23 selling, offering to sell, importing or exporting. For example, a sale by Defendants 24 or either of them of a product within the PRC for use, either as a stand-alone 25 product or in combination with another product, outside the PRC shall be deemed 26 Marketing. For the avoidance of doubt, “Marketing,” “Marketed,” or “Market” 27 does not include the operation of a website that describes, promotes, or otherwise 28 advertises Niell-Tech’s business and products, or otherwise indicates that Niell2 Consent Judgment, Permanent Injunction and Dismissal 1 Tech’s Restricted Products or Disputed Products are available for purchase and use 2 within the PRC, provided Niell-Tech includes the information specified in the 3 Settlement Agreement. The definition of Meggitt Proprietary Information and 4 Technology is as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, and is incorporated by 5 reference herein. 6 4. The restrictions on sale of Restricted Products set forth above in 7 Section 2.b, 2.c and 2.d expire on the 8th anniversary of the date this Order is 8 entered (that is, the date of entry plus eight (8) years). 9 5. The parties have stipulated to the entry of this Consent Judgment. In 10 doing so, the parties have further stipulated that Defendants do not admit liability or 11 wrongdoing in any way, and Defendants state that they are agreeing to its entry to 12 avoid the expense of trial. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 17 Dated: July 31, 2015 _________________________________ Hon. David O. Carter United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Consent Judgment, Permanent Injunction and Dismissal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Presented by: Robert W. Dickerson (State Bar No. 89,367) rdickerson@manatt.com Lawrence R. LaPorte (State Bar No. 130,003) llaporte@manatt.com MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 11355 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90064 Telephone: (310) 312-4000 Facsimile: (310) 312-4224 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MEGGITT (ORANGE COUNTY), INC. and MEGGITT (MARYLAND), INC. Daniel Johnson, Jr. (State Bar No. 57,409) djjohnson@morganlewis.com Michael J. Lyons (State Bar No. 202,284) mlyons@morganlewis.com MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700 Palo Alto, CA 94306-2122 Telephone: (650) 843-4000 Facsimile: (650) 843-4001 Attorneys for Defendants NIE YONGZHONG and XIAMEN NIELL ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Consent Judgment, Permanent Injunction and Dismissal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?