Keating Dental Arts Inc v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Filing
33
JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd against Keating Dental Arts Inc. (nbo)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
JS-6
David Simantob, SBN 155790
(E-Mail: dsimantob@tresslerllp.com)
Elizabeth L. Musser, SBN 203512
(E-Mail: emusser@tresslerllp.com)
Monica R. Dean, SBN 255372
(E-mail: mdean@tresslerllp.com)
TRESSLER LLP
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 450
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 203-4800
Facsimile: (310) 203-4850
Attorneys for Defendant
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
and Intervenor-Defendant
SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
15
16
KEATING DENTAL ARTS, INC., a
California Corporation,
17
18
19
20
Case No. SACV13-419 DOC(ANx)
Hon. David O. Carter
Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT RE HARTFORD
CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY’S AND SENTINEL
INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [24]
v.
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
21
Defendant.
22
23
24
The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Hartford Casualty
25
Insurance Company (“Hartford”) and intervernor-defendant Sentinel Insurance
26
Company, Ltd. (“Sentinel”) was fully briefed and submitted for consideration by the
27
Court.
28
1
JUDGMENT
1
After full consideration of the papers submitted by the moving and opposing
2
parties, the arguments of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court orders
3
summary judgment in favor of Hartford and Sentinel as follows:
4
Hartford and Sentinel owe no coverage obligation to plaintiff Keating Dental Arts,
5
Inc. (“Keating”) under (1) insurance policy number 72 SBA AB1425, effective September
6
4, 2010 to September 4, 2011 and (2) insurance policy number 72 SBA AB1425, effective
7
September 4, 2011 to September 4, 2012 with respect to the following underlying matter:
8
James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics, Inc. dba Glidewell Labratories v. Keating Dental
9
Arts, Inc., Case No. 8:11-CV-01309-DOC-AN (C.D. Cal.).
10
11
12
13
Accordingly, summary judgment is entered in favor of Hartford and Sentinel, and
against Keating with respect to all claims asserted in Keating’s complaint in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 7, 2013
14
Hon. David O. Carter
JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
LA-#129461 (240-405)
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?