Keating Dental Arts Inc v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company

Filing 33

JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd against Keating Dental Arts Inc. (nbo)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

JS-6

David Simantob, SBN 155790
(E-Mail: [e-mail])
Elizabeth L. Musser, SBN 203512
(E-Mail: [e-mail])
Monica R. Dean, SBN 255372
(E-mail: [e-mail])
TRESSLER LLP
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 450
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
and Intervenor-Defendant
SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

15
16

KEATING DENTAL ARTS, INC., a
California Corporation,

17
18
19
20

Case No. SACV13-419 DOC(ANx)
Hon. David O. Carter

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT RE HARTFORD
CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY’S AND SENTINEL
INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [24]

v.
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE
COMPANY,

21

Defendant.

22
23
24

The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Hartford Casualty

25

Insurance Company (“Hartford”) and intervernor-defendant Sentinel Insurance

26

Company, Ltd. (“Sentinel”) was fully briefed and submitted for consideration by the

27

Court.

28
1
JUDGMENT

1

After full consideration of the papers submitted by the moving and opposing

2

parties, the arguments of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court orders

3

summary judgment in favor of Hartford and Sentinel as follows:

4

Hartford and Sentinel owe no coverage obligation to plaintiff Keating Dental Arts,

5

Inc. (“Keating”) under (1) insurance policy number 72 SBA AB1425, effective September

6

4, 2010 to September 4, 2011 and (2) insurance policy number 72 SBA AB1425, effective

7

September 4, 2011 to September 4, 2012 with respect to the following underlying matter:

8

James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics, Inc. dba Glidewell Labratories v. Keating Dental

9

Arts, Inc., Case No. 8:11-CV-01309-DOC-AN (C.D. Cal.).

10
11
12
13

Accordingly, summary judgment is entered in favor of Hartford and Sentinel, and
against Keating with respect to all claims asserted in Keating’s complaint in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 7, 2013

14

Hon. David O. Carter
JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA

15
16
17

LA-#129461 (240-405)

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JUDGMENT