Xerox Corporation v. Jeevani and Associates, Inc

Filing 16

JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, in favor of Xerox Corporation against Jeevani and Associates, Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that default judgment on theComplaint is entered in favor of Xerox and against Defendant, and Xerox is awarded $430,220.01 and possession of the copier/printer equipment identified as Xerox XC800, serial number WXP008158; Xerox EX1000, serial number XDA302649; and Xerox P4112CPC, serial number GYA889238. re 14 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ) ) Case No.: SACV 13-00719-CJC(JPRx) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DEFAULT JUDGMENT ) JEEVANI AND ASSOCIATES, INC., a ) California Corporation dba THE ) PRINT CONNECTION, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) XEROX CORPORATION, 22 23 This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff Xerox Corporation’s (“Xerox”) 24 motion for default judgment against Defendant Jeevani and Associates, Inc., dba The 25 Print Connection (“Defendant”). (Dkt. No. 14.) On October 3, 2013, the Court, being 26 fully advised, issued an Order granting Xerox’s motion and finding that Xerox is entitled 27 to default judgment in its favor and against Defendant. In accordance with the Court’s 28 -1- 1 October 3, 2013 Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that default judgment on the 2 Complaint is entered in favor of Xerox and against Defendant, and Xerox is awarded 3 $430,220.01 and possession of the copier/printer equipment identified as Xerox XC800, 4 serial number WXP008158; Xerox EX1000, serial number XDA302649; and Xerox 5 P4112CPC, serial number GYA889238. 6 7 8 9 10 DATED: October 3, 2013 __________________________________ CORMAC J. CARNEY 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?