Noemi Jaramillo Quezada v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 37

ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. Fees awarded to Plaintiff in the amount of $ 9,400. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 36 (see attached) (jm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JIMMY O. EWENIKE, CSBN 133406 Law Offices of Jimmy Ewenike 515 West Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 210 Fullerton, CA. 92832 Telephone: (714) 773-0611 Facsimile: (714) 257-9987 E-Mail: Ewenike@yahoo.com STEPHANIE YONEKURA Acting United States Attorney LEON W. WEIDMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief Civil Division SUNDEEP R. PATEL, CSBN 242284 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel, Region IX 160 Spear Street, St. 800 San Francisco, CA 94105-1545 Email: sundeep.patel@ssa.gov Telephone: (415) 977-8873 Attorneys for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CENTRAL DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NOEMI JARAMILLOI QUEZADA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting ) Commissioner of Social ) Security ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) CASE #: CV 13-00765 JSL (FFM) ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 21 22 Based upon the parties' concurrently filed Stipulation for 23 Award of EAJA Fees (“Stipulation”), IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff 24 be awarded Nine Thousand Four Hundred and Zero Cents ($9,400) in 25 attorney fees, under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 26 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and Zero Dollars and Zero Cents ($0.0) in 27 costs, under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, subject to the terms of the 28 stipulation. Dated: _October 26, 2015 ____/S/ Frederick F. Mumm UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?