Noemi Jaramillo Quezada v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Filing
37
ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. Fees awarded to Plaintiff in the amount of $ 9,400. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 36 (see attached) (jm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
JIMMY O. EWENIKE, CSBN 133406
Law Offices of Jimmy Ewenike
515 West Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 210
Fullerton, CA. 92832
Telephone: (714) 773-0611
Facsimile: (714) 257-9987
E-Mail: Ewenike@yahoo.com
STEPHANIE YONEKURA
Acting United States Attorney
LEON W. WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief Civil Division
SUNDEEP R. PATEL, CSBN 242284
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel, Region IX
160 Spear Street, St. 800
San Francisco, CA 94105-1545
Email: sundeep.patel@ssa.gov
Telephone: (415) 977-8873
Attorneys for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CENTRAL DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
NOEMI JARAMILLOI QUEZADA
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
)
Commissioner of Social
)
Security
)
)
Defendant.
)
______________________________)
CASE #: CV 13-00765 JSL (FFM)
ORDER RE
STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND
PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. §
2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 1920
21
22
Based upon the parties' concurrently filed Stipulation for
23
Award of EAJA Fees (“Stipulation”), IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff
24
be awarded Nine Thousand Four Hundred and Zero Cents ($9,400) in
25
attorney fees, under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28
26
U.S.C. § 2412(d), and Zero Dollars and Zero Cents ($0.0) in
27
costs, under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, subject to the terms of the
28
stipulation.
Dated: _October 26, 2015
____/S/ Frederick F. Mumm
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?