Ernest Pada v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

Filing 32

JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Aetna Life Insurance Company against Ernest Pada. Plaintiff Ernest Pada shall take nothing by way of his complaint and the action is dismissed on the merits. As the prevailing party, Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company may recover attorneys fees and costs according to statute. Related to: Order 30 . (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 ERNEST PADA, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 vs. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. SACV13-01101DOC(CWx) Judge David O. Carter Complaint Filed: July 23, 2013 Trial Date: March 31, 2014 JUDGMENT 19 20 On April 18, 2014, the Honorable David O. Carter, after full consideration 21 of all the evidence and the oral argument of the parties at trial, issued a 22 Memorandum of Decision (Doc. 30) that is expressly incorporated by reference 23 herein and made a part of this Judgment. 24 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND 25 DECREED that JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendant Aetna Life 26 Insurance Company, and against Plaintiff Ernest Pada. Plaintiff Ernest Pada shall 27 take nothing by way of his complaint and the action is dismissed on the merits. As 28 the prevailing party, Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company may recover -1JUDGMENT CV13-01101-DOC(CWx) 1 attorneys’ fees and costs according to statute. 2 3 Dated: April 30, 2014 HON. DAVID O. CARTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 5 ___________________________________ Submitted By: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 RONALD K. ALBERTS (SBN: 100017) HILARY E. FEYBUSH (SBN: 280714) GORDON & REES LLP 633 West Fifth Street, 52nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 576-5000 Facsimile: (213) 680-4470 Attorneys for Defendant AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1090073/19258589v.1 -2JUDGMENT CV13-01101-DOC(CWx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?