United States of America et al v. Mobile Medical Examination Services Inc et al
Filing
131
JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin that (1) As to defendants Mobile Medical Examination Services, Inc. and MedXM, relator Anita Silingo dismises with prejudice all claims for relief in the 3rd AC. Plaintiff USA dismisses with prejudice the 1st clai m for relief of the 3rd AC to the extent it is based on 400 MEDXM health assessments that were revised by or on behalf of Dr.Muhammad Awaisi during and between 12/27/2012 and 2/5/2013 and 100 MEDXM health assessments that were revised by or on behalf of Dr. Cynane. In all other respects, the government dismisses the remainder of the TAC without prejudice. (2) As to defendants all claims for relief in the TAC are dismissed with prejudice. (3) The relator claim for a relator share to be paid by the government, is dismissed without prejudice. (4) Except as set forth in paragraph 3 of this Judgment, each party shall bear its or her own fees andcosts. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
ANITA SILINGO,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
MOBILE MEDICAL EXAMINATION
SERVICES, INC., et al.
16
Defendants.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. SA CV 13-1348 FMO (JCx)
JUDGMENT
18
Pursuant to: (1) the Notice of Settlement of Relator’s Share (Dkt. 130), (2) the Court’s
19
Order of July 11, 2016 (Dkt. 128), and (3) the Court’s Order of June 16, 2016 (Dkt. 123), IT IS
20
ADJUDGED that:
21
1. As to defendants Mobile Medical Examination Services, Inc. and MedXM (collectively,
22
“MEDXM”), relator Anita Silingo (“relator”) dismisses with prejudice all claims for relief in the Third
23
Amended Complaint (“TAC”). (See Dkt. 123, Court’s Order of June 16, 2016). Plaintiff the United
24
States of America (“government”) dismisses with prejudice the first claim for relief of the TAC to
25
the extent it is based on 400 MEDXM health assessments that were revised by or on behalf of Dr.
26
Muhammad Awaisi during and between December 27, 2012 and February 5, 2013 and 100
27
MEDXM health assessments that were revised by or on behalf of Dr. Cynane. (See id.). In all
28
other respects, the government dismisses the remainder of the TAC without prejudice.
1
2. As to defendants Molina Healthcare, Inc., Molina Healthcare of California, Molina
2
Healthcare Services, Molina Healthcare of California Partner Plan, Health Net, Inc., Health Net
3
of California, Inc., Health Net Life Insurance Company, Alameda Alliance for Health, Visiting Nurse
4
Service of New York, VNSNY Choice (erroneously sued as Visiting Nurse Service Choice),
5
WellPoint, Inc., Blue Cross of California (d/b/a and erroneously sued as Anthem Blue Cross), and
6
Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company, all claims for relief in the TAC are
7
dismissed with prejudice. (See Dkt. 128, Court’s Order of July 11, 2016).
8
3. The relator’s claim for a relator’s share to be paid by the government, see 31 U.S.C. §
9
3730(d)(2), is dismissed without prejudice. (See Dkt. 130, Notice of Settlement of Relator’s
10
Share).
11
4. Except as set forth in ¶ 3 of this Judgment, each party shall bear its or her own fees and
12
costs.
13
Dated this 24th day of August, 2016.
14
/s/
Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?