William Tezak et al v. Geoffrey T Glass et al
Filing
92
ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the records on fil e, and the Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action be dismissed with prejudice. (jy)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WILLIAM TEZAK,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
13
GEOFFREY T. GLASS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
Case No. CV 13-1566-JFW(PJW)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND
ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,
AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the First
17
Amended Complaint, the records on file, and the Final Report and
18
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.
19
has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to
20
which objections have been made.
21
recommendations of the magistrate judge.
22
23
24
Further, the Court
The Court accepts the findings and
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action be dismissed with
prejudice.
DATED:
November 4, 2014.
25
26
JOHN F. WALTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
C:\Temp\notesD30550\Order accep r&r.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?