William Tezak et al v. Geoffrey T Glass et al

Filing 92

ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John F. Walter. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the records on fil e, and the Final Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action be dismissed with prejudice. (jy)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM TEZAK, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 GEOFFREY T. GLASS, et al., 14 Defendants. Case No. CV 13-1566-JFW(PJW) ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the First 17 Amended Complaint, the records on file, and the Final Report and 18 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. 19 has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to 20 which objections have been made. 21 recommendations of the magistrate judge. 22 23 24 Further, the Court The Court accepts the findings and IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action be dismissed with prejudice. DATED: November 4, 2014. 25 26 JOHN F. WALTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 C:\Temp\notesD30550\Order accep r&r.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?