Innovative Wireless Solutions, LLC v. Hawking Technologies, Inc.

Filing 57

FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON INFRINGEMENT DUE TO COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL by Judge Cormac J. Carney. See Judgment for more information. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

1
2
3
4

JS-6

5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SOUTHERN DIVISION

12 INNOVATIVE WIRELESS
13 SOLUTIONS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16

v.
ZyXEL COMMUNCATIONS, INC.,

Case No. 8:13-cv-01812-CJC-(ANx)
Judge: The Hon. Cormac J. Carney
FINAL JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT DUE TO
COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL

17
18

Defendant.

19 INNOVATIVE WIRELESS
SOLUTIONS, LLC,
20
Plaintiff,
21
v.
22

Case No. 2:13-cv-08545-CJC (ANx)

23 TRENDNET, INC.,
24

Defendant.

25
26
27
28
FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT DUE
TO COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL

-1-

CASE NOS. 8:13cv1812;
2:13cv8545; 2:13cv8548; 8:13cv1815

1

INNOVATIVE WIRELESS
2 SOLUTIONS, LLC,
Plaintiff,

3
4

Case No. 2:13-cv-08548-CJC (ANx)

v.

5
6

TP-LINK USA CORPORATION,
Defendant.

7

8 INNOVATIVE WIRELESS
SOLUTIONS, LLC,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11

Case No. 8:13-cv-01815-CJC (ANx)

12 HAWKING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
13

Defendant.

14
15

Before the Court is the Joint Stipulation For Entry of Final Judgment of Non-

16 Infringement Due to Collateral Estoppel filed by Plaintiff Innovative Wireless Solutions,
17 LLC (“Plaintiff” or “IWS”) and Defendants and Defendants ZyXEL Communications,
18 Inc., TRENDnet, Inc., TP-Link USA Corporation, and Hawking Technologies, Inc.
19 (collectively “Defendants”) in the above cases. Based on the stipulation of the parties,
20 and good cause appearing, the parties’ joint stipulation is APPROVED and SO
21 ORDERED. Accordingly, the Court enters the following Final Judgment pursuant to
22 Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
23

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

24

1.

Final Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,912,895;

25 6,327,264; and 6,587,473 (collectively, the “Patents-in-Suit”) due to Collateral Estoppel,
26 based on the March 4, 2015 judgments entered in Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Innovative
27 Wireless Solutions, LLC, Case No. 1:13-cv-00492-LY (W.D. Tex.) (“the Cisco case”)
28 and Ruckus Wireless, Inc. v. Innovative Wireless Solutions, LLC, Case No. 1:13-cvFINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT DUE
TO COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL

-2-

CASE NOS. 8:13cv1812;
2:13cv8545; 2:13cv8548; 8:13cv1815

1 00504-LY (W.D. Tex.) (“the Ruckus case”), is entered against IWS and for Defendants
2 on: (i) IWS’s claims for infringement of the Patents-in-Suit, and (ii) the counterclaims
3 for declaratory judgment of non-infringement of the Patents-in-Suit asserted by Hawking
4 Technologies, Inc., and ZyXEL Communications, Inc. (the other Defendants having not
5 filed counterclaims); for the purposes of clarity, this judgment is subject to and without
6 waiving or restricting IWS’s right to move for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(5)
7 if the judgments in the Cisco and Ruckus cases are reversed or vacated;
8

2.

All other claims, counterclaims, defenses, or other matters which have been

9 asserted are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
10
11
12 Dated: March 12, 2015
Cormac J. Carney
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT DUE
TO COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL

-3-

CASE NOS. 8:13cv1812;
2:13cv8545; 2:13cv8548; 8:13cv1815